Doctrine as security? A systematic theological critique of the operational theological framework of the controversial South African neo-Pentecostal prophets

Abstract

This research article uses the theoretical framework of doctrine as believer’s security to critique the theological framework behind the controversial activities reported amongst some South African neo-Pentecostal prophets (NPPs), which include feeding congregants with grass, spraying them with insecticides and sexual violation of women congregants. The framework of the article falls within the discipline of systematic theology by raising the importance for South African Christians to develop a critical doctrinal framework for protecting themselves from controversial NPPs. The following main question is answered by the article: from a systematic theological perspective, how can we evaluate the theological framework, which leads to the recent controversial activities reported amongst some NPPs in South Africa? Consequently, the article, firstly, describes the critical theological framework of the protective role of Christian doctrine. Secondly, it describes the South African NPPs and their controversial practices. Thirdly, this article analyses some of the theological problems in the current operative framework of NPPs. Fourthly, it argues for the need for doctrinally informed critical thinking as a safety measure against controversial NPPs. Finally, some steps that must be taken by NPPs to develop critical theological thinking in order to overcome doctrinally vacuous experientialism that promotes controversial religious activities are provided.Contribution: From a systematic theological approach, this article attempts to demonstrate the importance of critical doctrinal thinking as a defence mechanism for protecting Christians from falling prey to harmful religious practices, such as those recently reported amongst some NPPs in South Africa.

Resurgence of African Spiritualities in the New Prophetic Churches

“…These are the new churches, taking a different shape from classical Pentecostalism due to their practices. Many recent Pentecostal scholars agree that the NPCs draw their theology from Neo-Pentecostalism, with distinct emphasis on prophetic dimension of the same theology (Kgatle, 2019, Kgatle & Anderson, 2020, White & Pondani, 2020, Ramantswana, 2018, Tsekpoe, 2019& Banda, 2021. Kgatle (2023:2) highlights that 'the movement is popular for prophetic deliverance, titles, problem diagnosis, products, and consultations.'…”

Pentecostal theology regarding disability in African neo-Pentecostalism

“…These churches, unlike the classical Pentecostal churches, do emphasise the performance of miracles, healing, and deliverance (Banda 2022). It is this quest for the miraculous, that has caused some of these churches to be involved in one controversy after the other (Banda 2020b;2021). Some of the neo-Pentecostal churches in Africa have direct links with the faith movement of Kenneth Hagin, and therefore emphasise the gospel of prosperity (Kgatle 2022).…”

Violence and Corruption of Megachurch Leaders: Unravelling Silent Coloniality in Zimbabwe

“…Makandiwa's followers regard him as a very important man who should not be subjected to scrutiny since he was chosen by God to lead this generation. In a sense, Makandiwa's followers promote him as though he is God or someone replacing Christ (Banda 2018). To expand on this point, Makandiwa appeared in a video where he states that he is "more gifted than God" (ZimEye 2023), which, rightfully, stirred up controversy and debate.…”

“…Much research has been conducted on the intersection of megachurches and politics in Zimbabwe and beyond. Megachurches are religious groupings that have large followings wherein a leader occupies a crucial position in relation to divine deity and is often equated to Christ (Banda 2018). Megachurches use language "embedded [with] logic that enforces control, domination, and exploitation disguised in the language of salvation, progress, modernization, and being good for everyone" (Mignolo 2005, p. 6).…”