2014
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2013.0412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Document image super‐resolution using structural similarity and Markov random field

Abstract: Low-resolution (LR) document images may cause difficulties in reading or low recognition rates in computer vision. Thus, it is necessary to improve the resolution of an LR document image via some algorithms. In this study, a novel document image super-resolution (SR) method using structural similarity and Markov random field (MRF) is proposed. First, the non-local algorithm is utilised to find similar patches. Instead of using the Euclidian distance, a modified chi-square distance is proposed to measure the pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, two example‐based document image SR methods [10, 12] are experimented for document images in dataset I, using an example‐set with the same font type and size as the test document images. The total PSNR is 20.14 and 20.68 in [10, 12], respectively, while the total SSIM is 0.914 and 0.925 in [10, 12], respectively. In addition, the total OCR accuracy is 91.54 and 93.03 in [10, 12], respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For comparison, two example‐based document image SR methods [10, 12] are experimented for document images in dataset I, using an example‐set with the same font type and size as the test document images. The total PSNR is 20.14 and 20.68 in [10, 12], respectively, while the total SSIM is 0.914 and 0.925 in [10, 12], respectively. In addition, the total OCR accuracy is 91.54 and 93.03 in [10, 12], respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total PSNR is 20.14 and 20.68 in [10, 12], respectively, while the total SSIM is 0.914 and 0.925 in [10, 12], respectively. In addition, the total OCR accuracy is 91.54 and 93.03 in [10, 12], respectively. Clearly, the results of these two methods should be the best, because other methods in Table 3 do not use any examples for SR.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations