Documentation and classification of hospital pharmacist interventions: A scoping review

Abstract

The practice of documenting pharmacists’ interventions (PIs) has been endorsed by many hospital pharmacists’ societies and organizations worldwide. Current systems for recording PIs have been developed to generate data on better patient and healthcare outcomes, but harmonization and transferability are apparently minimal. The present work aims to provide a descriptive and comprehensive overview of the currently utilized PIs documentation and classification tools contributing to increased evidence systematization.A systematic literature search was conducted in PUBMED, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Studies from 2008, after the release of the Basel Statements, were included if interventions were made by hospital or clinical pharmacists in a global hospital setting. Publications quality assessment was accomplished using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).A total of 26 studies were included. Three studies did not refer to the documentation/classification method, ten used an in‐house developed documentation/classification method, seven used externally developed documentation/classification tools, and six studies described method validation or translation.Evidence confirmed that most documentation/classification systems are designed in‐house, but external development and validation of PI systems to be used in hospital practice is gradually increasing. Reports on validated PIs documentation/classification tools that are being used in hospital clinical practice are limited, including countries with advanced hospital pharmacy practice. Needs and gaps in practice were identified. Further research should be conducted to understand why using validated documentation/classification methods is not a disseminated practice, knowing patients’ and organizational advantages.

Enhancing drug therapy in ostomy patients: Best practice recommendations for medication management

“…Patients had the chance to ask questions regarding their medication with no need to focus on ORPs. The category patient counseling is not included in all classification tools for PIs used in other countries [ 52 ]. The MEDAP study has demonstrated that communication-based interventions are more prevalent in outpatient settings [ 53 ].…”