2000
DOI: 10.7826/isr-um.06.585031.001.05.0005.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Documentation of Affective Functioning Measures in the Health and Retirement Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
576
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 580 publications
(583 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
576
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two response categories were those who reported having poor or fair health against all others. Depression was measured by an eight-item version of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies -Depression (CES-D) scale (Radloff, 1977;Steffick, 2000). The cut-off point for its dichotomization was four or more depressive symptoms (Steffick, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two response categories were those who reported having poor or fair health against all others. Depression was measured by an eight-item version of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies -Depression (CES-D) scale (Radloff, 1977;Steffick, 2000). The cut-off point for its dichotomization was four or more depressive symptoms (Steffick, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depression was measured by an eight-item version of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies -Depression (CES-D) scale (Radloff, 1977;Steffick, 2000). The cut-off point for its dichotomization was four or more depressive symptoms (Steffick, 2000). Long-standing illness or disability was assessed by the question: "Do you have any long-standing illness, disability or infirmity?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 Using a cutoff of 3 or more has been found to have a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 79% for the diagnosis of major depression compared to structured diagnostic interview. 36 We used a cutoff score of 4 or higher on the 8-item CES-D to define substantial depressive symptoms because this threshold was estimated to be comparable to the cutoff score of 16 or higher on the full CES-D by HRS investigators, 37 and has been used in several prior studies. 3840 We defined pre-sepsis substantial depressive symptoms as a CES-D score reaching threshold at any interview before severe sepsis, while post-sepsis substantial depressive symptoms was defined similarly for any interview after severe sepsis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on self-reported doctor-diagnosed cardiovascular morbidity (hypertension, angina, heart attack, congestive heart failure, heart murmur, abnormal heart rhythm and stroke) and self-reported doctor-diagnosed noncardiovascular morbidity (chronic lung disease, asthma, arthritis, osteoporosis, cancer/malignant tumour excluding minor skin cancers, Parkinson's disease, emotional/nervous/ psychiatric problems, Alzheimer's disease and dementia or other serious memory impairment) were also used. Depressive symptoms were assessed as the summary score of the eight-item Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale dichotomised around the cut-point of four or more depressive symptoms [10]. Because anthropometric data were not collected at baseline (wave 1), we calculated BMI by using pre-ELSA data on height and weight that were collected by nurses during a clinical examination in ELSA wave 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%