Does a better vitamin D status help to reduce cardiovascular risks and events?

Abstract

Vitamin D is one and maybe even the most frequently used ''drug'' in the world as it is recommended as supplement during the early years of life from infancy onwards, and is also recommended systematically for all elderly subjects with little exposure to sunlight. This is mainly inspired by the essential role of the vitamin D endocrine system for bone health [1][2][3]. The vitamin D receptor and activating enzyme, CYP27B1, are both fairly generally expressed in most tissues and the vitamin D hormone, 1,25(OH) 2 D, also regulates a great number of genes, far more than needed for calcium transport. Therefore the question and hypothesis arise that the vitamin D endocrine system would have many extra-skeletal effects and that vitamin D supplementation may help to reduce the burden of nearly all major human diseases [1][2][3]. The cardiovascular system may well be such non classical target tissue for vitamin D action based on a vast and rapidly increasing number of publications and reviews in basic and clinical journals, and even in the lay press. Two manuscripts published in the present issue of endocrine add new data for this debate.Ellis et al. [4] report that cardio respiratory fitness [measured by respiratory quotient (RQ) after moderate exercise and VO 2 max during a graded treadmill protocol] of women, aged 60 or more, is inversely correlated with serum 25OHD levels, albeit that this relation was only significant in Afro-Americans and not in Caucasians. The RQ data also suggest that a better vitamin D status was also associated with greater fat oxidation during sub maximal exercise. The study is however handicapped by the low number of subjects and by inconsistency between data in Afro-Americans and Caucasians. Moreover reverse causality is not discussed as it may well be that elderly women with greater habitual exercise have better VO 2 max and more exposure to sunlight during exercise. The second study tried to link carotid intima-media thickness (measured by ultrasonography and known to be a good surrogate marker of cardiovascular risks and events) with serum 25OHD and parathyroid hormone levels in a mixed population of vitamin D deficient (mean serum 25OHD of 13 ng/ml) patients recently admitted to a general hospital [5]. Carotid intima-media thickness correlated positively with age and body mass index, as expected, but not with serum 25OHD or parathyroid hormaone levels. There are many possible reasons for this lack of correlation including the low number of subjects with good vitamin D status and the complex mixture of patients.These two studies are in fact a good example of what is presently known with regard to the link between vitamin D status and cardiovascular risks and events. Such a link is plausible as very severe vitamin D deficiency (such as in Cyp27B1 null mice) or resistance (such as in Vdr null mice) is causing renin-mediated hypertension, decreased fibrinolysis and increased thrombogenicity [1][2][3]6]. Systemic or cardiomyocyte specific Vdr knock out also causes cardiac hypertrophy and car...

Animal (De)liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned?

“…Vegans must be careful, however, to avoid overconsumption of refined carbohydrates (as for example white-flour products, white rice, and sugar), as this reduces HDL, which removes excess LDL cholesterol from the bloodstream (O'Neill 2010, 202-203). As mentioned before, they must also be careful to maintain adequate levels of vitamins B12 and D, as well as a good balance of n-6 over n-3 fatty acids, as deficiencies in these domains have been associated with elevated risks of cardio-vascular disease (Li 2011;Woo et al 2014;Bouillon and Verlinden 2014).…”

Vitamin D across growth hormone (GH) disorders: From GH deficiency to GH excess

“…During the last few years, vitamin D deficiency has also emerged as an additional potential cardiovascular risk factor [44][45][46]. The impact of vitamin D deficiency on cardiovascular risk was explored by Savanelli et al in 41 hypopituitaric patients with GHD and 41 controls.…”

Vitamin D supplementation after the second year of life: joint position of the Committee on Nutrition, German Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ e.V.), and the German Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology (DGKED e.V.)

“…The recommended vitamin D target values are not based on the normal distribution of apparently healthy populations. Target values are based on considering vitamin D serum levels at which sufficient calcium is absorbed [13, 21, 22]. Considering only enteral vitamin D intakes, healthy people aged 1–70 years of age need a daily intake of 400 IU (estimated average requirement [EAR]), with a mean serum vitamin D level of 16 ng/mL.…”

“…This results in a targeted vitamin D serum level of 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L), which corresponds to the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) or the Population Reference Intake (PRI) [24]. However, this limit also implies that many people below this vitamin D level still have adequate calcium absorption [13]. This explains, among other things, why a majority of children with vitamin D serum levels below the target level or even vitamin D deficiency as defined in Table 1 do not develop rickets or apparent alterations in bone mineralization, and only a fraction of these children and adolescents show secondary hyperparathyroidism.…”

“…

Fig. 1Distribution of vitamin D serum concentrations to ensure adequate calcium absorption in a healthy population and the resulting limits in the absence of sun exposure (figure adapted according to [13])

…”