2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00792.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does a Family‐controlled Firm Perform Better in Corporate Venturing?

Abstract: Manuscript Type: EmpiricalResearch Question/Issue: Family control involves issues of agency costs and nepotism. This study investigated the impacts of family control on stock market reactions to corporate venturing announcements by public firms. Moreover, in this paper we examined whether the monitoring effect of institutional investors influenced the relationship between family control and stock market reactions. Research Findings/Insights: In terms of research findings/results, with different measures of fam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
3
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpreted through the lens of SEW, our findings are consistent with the idea that, relative to non‐family firms, family firms prioritize non‐economic goals, such as family dynasty and legacy, reputation, and social identity, which are represented by employment growth, to a greater extent than economic goals, such as firm financial performance and sales growth. These findings may shed light on those of Wong, Chang, and Chen (), who find that the stock market reaction to corporate venturing announcements is significantly lower for family‐controlled firms among a sample of publicly‐traded Taiwanese firms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Interpreted through the lens of SEW, our findings are consistent with the idea that, relative to non‐family firms, family firms prioritize non‐economic goals, such as family dynasty and legacy, reputation, and social identity, which are represented by employment growth, to a greater extent than economic goals, such as firm financial performance and sales growth. These findings may shed light on those of Wong, Chang, and Chen (), who find that the stock market reaction to corporate venturing announcements is significantly lower for family‐controlled firms among a sample of publicly‐traded Taiwanese firms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Yet there tend to be—especially at the crossroad between family business and corporate entrepreneurship literatures—some major conceptual gaps (McKelvie et al ; Sciascia and Bettinelli ). The scholarly debate on CV in family firms, for example, still mostly refers to family versus nonfamily attitude toward venturing or capability to manage CV, thereby treating family influence as a single construct (e.g., Wong, Chang, and Chen ). In this paper, we support the need to take into account the heterogeneity of family firms, beyond comparing family and nonfamily firms (Chua et al ; McKelvie et al ; Sciascia and Bettinelli ; Sharma, Chrisman, and Gersick ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on agency theory (Jensen & Meckling, ; Shleifer & Vishny, ), we predict that both family member and family representative involvement are associated with higher agency costs to minority shareholders. Prior studies in emerging market settings generally find that family involvement is negatively related to performance, due to higher agency costs between the controlling family and other shareholders (e.g., Bae, Kim, & Kim, ; Bertrand, Johnson, Samphantharak, & Schoar, ; Wong, Chang, & Chen, ; Yeh & Woidtke, ). In this study, we apply these same agency cost arguments to family representatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%