2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00117-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does a reduced sensitivity to bitter taste increase the risk of becoming nicotine addicted?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
49
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it has been suggested that sensitivity to bitter compounds such as PTC and PROP may protect against cigarette smoking (Enoch et al, 2001;Kaplan et al, 1964;Snedecor et al, 2006). However, we found that the women who smoked were as likely to be sensitive to PROP as were women who never smoked, a finding which is consistent with a recent study in which 567 individuals were genotyped for polymorphisms that affect taste sensitivity to PROP and PTC (Cannon et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it has been suggested that sensitivity to bitter compounds such as PTC and PROP may protect against cigarette smoking (Enoch et al, 2001;Kaplan et al, 1964;Snedecor et al, 2006). However, we found that the women who smoked were as likely to be sensitive to PROP as were women who never smoked, a finding which is consistent with a recent study in which 567 individuals were genotyped for polymorphisms that affect taste sensitivity to PROP and PTC (Cannon et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…First, unlike PTC, it is odorless and safer (Lawless, 1980). Second, previous research suggested that smokers were significantly more likely to be insensitive to PROP and PTC (Enoch et al, 2001;Kaplan et al, 1964;Snedecor et al, 2006) and that PROP sensitivity may be related to sweet taste sensitivity (Chang et al, 2006). To this end, subjects tasted, but did not swallow, in ascending order, water and then three 5 ml solutions of PROP (56, 180, and 560 μM), rinsing before and after each tasting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are consistent with the studies of Saldanha (1962) regarding conducted in Portugal, Azevedo et al (1965) conducted in Brazil and the results of Turkey mentioned in the study of Guo and Reed (2001) (Azevedo et al, 1965;Saldanha, 1962). According to the studies conducted so far, the distribution of PRC/PROP taste blindness (the ability and lack of detecting the taste of bitter chemicals) is as follows: 2.3-36.5% (Africa), 5.1-23% (China), 4.8-66.7% (India), 2.0-27.5% (Asia), 4.1-20.0% (Turkey), 49.3-50.0% (Australia), 6.9-36.8% (Europe) and 0-43.0% (USA), respectively (Guo and Reed, 2001;Tepper and Nurse, 1998;Saraswathi et al, 2011;Tepper, 1998;Guo et al, 1998;Enoch et al, 2001). When the results compared with the results of a study mentioned in the book of Demirsoy (1998), which was conducted with 3643 people in Turkish community, it can be seen that the frequency of the taster individuals is higher in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Two studies reported a higher percentage (~50%) of PTC/PROP non-tasters among smokers than in the general population. 7,8 Moreover, PTC non-tasters had higher nicotine dependence scores. 8 Phenotypic variation in PROP/PTC taste sensitivity is controlled by sequence variation in the bitter receptor gene TAS2R38 that accounts for a major portion (55%-85%), but not all of the variance in sensitivity.…”
Section: Original Investigationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7,8 On the other hand, bitter taste may be a potential risk factor for non-adherence to oral NRT in smokers who wish to quit.…”
Section: Original Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%