Aim:The purpose of this study was to describe prognostic factors for cerebral infraction and outcome in patients undergoing neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling with intracranial aneurysms. In addition, we compared the incidence of cerebral infraction and outcome in patients treated with neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling. Patients and Methods: Data were analysed from 972 patients with intracranial aneurysms enrolled at Union Hospital between September 2007 and May 2011. Multivariable logistic regression with backwards selection were derived to define independent predictors of cerebral infraction and outcome in patients undergoing neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Results: In the multivariable analysis, cerebral infraction was not associated with the history of hypertension, smoking, diabetes mellitus, aneurysmal size and number, the use of dehydrant and low-dosage i.v. nimodipine. Factors that contributed most to variation in cerebral infraction, in descending order of importance, were Fisher grade of the computed tomography scan, aneurysmal location, Hunt and Hess scale grade on admission, rupture times, the operating day from first rupture, increasing age, treatment modality and male sex. Predictors of poor outcome, also in descending order of importance, were Hunt and Hess scale grade IV, rupture one to three times, cerebral infraction, Fisher grade 3, operation on 4th-14th day from rupture, diabetes mellitus history, age > 55 years, hypertension history, smoking history and neurosurgical clipping. Conclusion: Although most prognostic factors for cerebral infraction and outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage are already present on admission, for suitable patients endovascular coiling and early intervention are recommended.