2019
DOI: 10.1017/s1463423619000598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does a social prescribing ‘holistic’ link-worker for older people with complex, multimorbidity improve well-being and frailty and reduce health and social care use and costs? A 12-month before-and-after evaluation

Abstract: Aim: To evaluate the impact of ‘holistic’ link-workers on service users’ well-being, activation and frailty, and their use of health and social care services and the associated costs. Background: UK policy is encouraging social prescribing (SP) as a means to improve well-being, self-care and reduce demand on the NHS and social services. However, the evidence to support this policy is generally weak and poorly conceptualised, particularly in relation to frail, older people and patient act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
122
0
12

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
122
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies indicate that these prescriptions improve social inclusion [2][3][4][5] , mental well-being, 6 physical activity levels, 7 and selfmanagement of health. 8,9 However, beyond identifying the impact of these prescriptions, it is equally important to understand how SP as a process facilitates these outcomes. As such, this paper builds on the work done by Hanlon et al, 10 Kellezi et al 3 and Payne et al 11 in trying to understand the "how" of SP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies indicate that these prescriptions improve social inclusion [2][3][4][5] , mental well-being, 6 physical activity levels, 7 and selfmanagement of health. 8,9 However, beyond identifying the impact of these prescriptions, it is equally important to understand how SP as a process facilitates these outcomes. As such, this paper builds on the work done by Hanlon et al, 10 Kellezi et al 3 and Payne et al 11 in trying to understand the "how" of SP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most evidence on social prescribing to date is from the perspective of the patient and their outcomes. Various studies have shown the benefits of the link worker role to patients, and some are also starting to evaluate social prescribing from the perspective of link workers [21,22]. But the role of the GP in social prescribing is less well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have identified that the success of social prescribing seems to rest on the GP's ability to identify social issues and root cause [23]. It also appears to rely on GP "buy-in" to validate the service among other professionals and patients, and requires GPs to believe in the link worker's ability and in the benefits of social prescribing [22]. Further, a few studies have included interviews with GPs, but these have tended to involve a very small number of GP interviews, or focused solely on 1 practice or locale [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social prescribing schemes provide a pathway for referring patients from primary care services to non-clinical services in the community, often provided by third sector organisations [ 15 ]. Evidence for social prescribing is generally weak [ 16 , 17 ] and studies are required to better understand implementation. Physical activity referral schemes (PARS) are an internationally recognised pathway for referring patients from primary and secondary care to supervised PA opportunities [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%