2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01354.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does access to bed‐chair pressure sensors reduce physical restraint use in the rehabilitative care setting?

Abstract: 2 0 0 6 ) Journal of Clinical Nursing 15, 581-587 Does access to bed-chair pressure sensors reduce physical restraint use in the rehabilitative care setting? Background. The common use of physical restraints in older people in hospitals and nursing homes has been associated with injurious falls, decreased mobility and disorientation. By offering access to bed-chair pressure sensors in hospitalized patients with perceived fall risk, nurses may be less inclined to resort to physical restraints, thereby improving… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an extensive RCT study by Lauriks et al (2008) concluded that the residents with surveillance technologies had significantly fewer falls than those without. In another RCT study, Kwok et al (2006) concluded that technology (in the form of a bedchair pressure sensor) enhances supervision by nursing staff and may therefore prevent falls. Other research papers/case studies all report that the (multiple) devices they have either examined or designed have the benefit of reducing (potentially) harmful incidents (Blackburn 1988Gibson, 2003;Chen et al, 2007, Miskelly et al, 2004Schikhof and Mulder, 2008).…”
Section: Autonomymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, an extensive RCT study by Lauriks et al (2008) concluded that the residents with surveillance technologies had significantly fewer falls than those without. In another RCT study, Kwok et al (2006) concluded that technology (in the form of a bedchair pressure sensor) enhances supervision by nursing staff and may therefore prevent falls. Other research papers/case studies all report that the (multiple) devices they have either examined or designed have the benefit of reducing (potentially) harmful incidents (Blackburn 1988Gibson, 2003;Chen et al, 2007, Miskelly et al, 2004Schikhof and Mulder, 2008).…”
Section: Autonomymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Age was often reported to be one of the predictors of physical restraint usage in studies [33]. Locally, Kwok et al (2006) observed that around 79% of older adults in his sample were restrained at one time or another during their hospital stay [34]. Our restrained participants were also older in age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Nevertheless, a previous attempt to reduce physical restraint by providing pressure monitors in 2 of these wards in the same hospital was not successful. 23 On this occasion, the program was led by the nurse in charge of the department and supported by the geriatricians and the hospital chief executive. The senior management also provided extra resources in providing electrical high low beds, pressure sensors, and shortened bed rails, which facilitated transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%