Does an Implant Usage Report Card Impact Orthopaedic Trauma Implant Stewardship?

Abstract

Objectives: As hospitals seek to control variable expenses, orthopaedic surgeons have come under scrutiny because of relatively high implant costs. We aimed to determine whether feedback to surgeons regarding implant costs results in changes in implant selection. Methods: This study was undertaken at a statewide trauma referral center and included 6 fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons. A previously implemented implant stewardship program at our institution using a “red-yellow-green” (RYG) implant selection tool classifies 7 commonly used trauma implant constructs based on cost and categorizes each implant as red (used for patient-specific requirements, most expensive), yellow (midrange), and green (preferred vendor, least expensive). The constructs included were femoral intramedullary nail, tibial intramedullary nail, long and short cephalomedullary nails, distal femoral plate, proximal tibial plate, and lower-limb external fixator. Baseline implant usage from the previous year was obtained and provided to each surgeon. Each surgeon received a monthly feedback report containing individual implant utilization and overall ranking. Results: The overall RYG score increased from 68.7 to 79.1 of 100 (P < 0.001). Three of the 7 implants (tibial and femoral nails and lower-limb external fixation) had significant increases in their RYG scores; implant selections for the other 4 implants were not significantly altered. A decrease of 1.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.4–3.2, P = 0.01) was noted in overall implant costs over the study period. Conclusion: Our intervention resulted in changes in surgeons' implant selections and cost savings. However, surgeons were unwilling to change certain implants despite their being more expensive.

Medial injuries of the clavicle: more prevalent than expected? A big data analysis of incidence, age, and gender distribution based on nationwide routine data

“…The high number of cases in this study implies that a reliable statement about the age and gender distribution of MCI can be made. SCJDs are an unusual injury, and the incidence of this injury compared with all clavicle-related shoulder-girdle injuries seems to be extremely rare and even less frequent than assumed [ 4 , 6 , 11 , 15 ]. In contrast, MCF occurs more frequently than estimated so far.…”

Bundled Payments for Hip Fracture Surgery Are Associated With Improved Access, Quality, and Health Care Utilization, but Higher Costs for Complex Cases: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

“…Strategies to contain implant cost growth across multiple fronts without compromising patient care quality are critical elements to abate rising acute health care cost. 28 This is Singapore's first study on bundled payments. The findings may be generalizable because the hip fracture workload at TTSH is a sizable proportion of the national burden.…”

External Fixation Characteristics Drive Cost of Care for High-Energy Tibial Plateau Fractures

“…25 It has been shown that improved physician awareness of implant costs results in successful reduction of total cost of care. 26,27 Okike et al 26 noted that price transparency helped increase the use of less expensive implants. Competition among implant vendors ultimately lead to decreased overall costs.…”