2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3942-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does an increased cesarean section rate improve neonatal outcome in term pregnancies?

Abstract: Increasing cesarean section rate from a low to a moderate does not improve the short-term neonatal outcome in term singleton pregnancies. On the contrary neonatal intensive care unit admissions increased with increasing caesarean section rate. Furthermore it is possible to achieve good neonatal outcome with a low cesarean section rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Vaginal delivery and vacuum-assistance were the only significant risk factors for intracranial hemorrhages, from a number of obstetric variables evaluated in our study. In Finland, the rate of c-sections almost doubled between the years 1998 and 2005, from 6.8 to 11.3% (27), with the latest rate of 15.9% for sections (6.7% for emergency sections) (24), and a similar trend in the popularity of c-sections can be seen worldwide (28). The current reasoning behind selecting c-section as the delivery method more frequently is to ensure the safety of the neonate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vaginal delivery and vacuum-assistance were the only significant risk factors for intracranial hemorrhages, from a number of obstetric variables evaluated in our study. In Finland, the rate of c-sections almost doubled between the years 1998 and 2005, from 6.8 to 11.3% (27), with the latest rate of 15.9% for sections (6.7% for emergency sections) (24), and a similar trend in the popularity of c-sections can be seen worldwide (28). The current reasoning behind selecting c-section as the delivery method more frequently is to ensure the safety of the neonate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The current reasoning behind selecting c-section as the delivery method more frequently is to ensure the safety of the neonate. However, this has not lead to improvements in neonatal outcomes in the short term, but instead has increased admissions to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) (27). Cesarean sections are known to predispose neonates to respiratory distress and tachypnea (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, cesarean section (CS) rates have increased during the last decades [1] resulting in an overall CS rate close to 26 % in 2010 [2]. CS rates differ substantially in different parts of the world, ranging from approximately 1 % in some African countries (South Sudan and Niger) to 56 % in some American countries (Brazil and the Dominican Republic) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports the argument that a rise in the CS rate is likely to improve pregnancy outcomes. However, in developed countries, a sharp increase in CS rate has not been shown to improve pregnancy outcomes and could be associated with increased adverse maternal complications [7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%