2000
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.69.5.668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does APO epsilon 4 correlate with MRI changes in Alzheimer's disease?

Abstract: for demographic and disease related variables. Results-30 patients had no 4, 53 patients were heterozygous, and 21 patients were homozygous. The three groups did not diVer in sex distribution, age of onset, age at MRI, MMSE, clinical dementia rating, or modified Hachinski ischaemia scores. There were no significant correlations between total or regional white matter scores and APO E genotype (Pearson correlation). Conclusions-No correlation between total or regional white matter scores and APO E genotype was f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e32,e33 APOE e44 and WMH. When meta-analyzing 12 studies (n 5 7,494, 6,254 in the general population, 1,240 in high-risk populations, tables e-2 and e-3) 3,11,13,21,28,30,31,[37][38][39] (Sydney-MAS, FHS, unpublished data) in a sample size-weighted meta-analysis, APOE e44 was significantly associated with increasing WMH burden: p z score 5 0.0030.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e32,e33 APOE e44 and WMH. When meta-analyzing 12 studies (n 5 7,494, 6,254 in the general population, 1,240 in high-risk populations, tables e-2 and e-3) 3,11,13,21,28,30,31,[37][38][39] (Sydney-MAS, FHS, unpublished data) in a sample size-weighted meta-analysis, APOE e44 was significantly associated with increasing WMH burden: p z score 5 0.0030.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis restricted to studies using continuous WMH burden and providing standardized mean differences (n 5 8,917, 8,405 in the general population and 512 in high-risk populations) 2,3,11,24,26,30,33,35,36,38,39 (Sydney-MAS, unpublished data) yielded a borderline nominal association of APOE e41 with increasing WMH burden: pooled standardized mean difference 5 0.047 (95% confidence interval 0.0006, 0.094) (p 5 0.05) (p z score 5 0.0631) (figure 1A). When adding studies using continuous WMH but providing regression coefficients (n 5 4,004) 5,40,41 (FHS, unpublished data), in a sample size-weighted z score-based metaanalysis, the association was p z score 5 0.0028.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 -36,48 Eleven compared the numbers of individuals in lower and upper WMH grades between genotype groups ( Figure 1A), 14,16,17,22,23,25,29,30,33 3 compared mean grade ( Figure 1B), 15,21,24 and 4 compared mean volume ( Figure 1C). 20,28,34 Random-effects meta-analyses comparing 4ϩ with 4Ϫ genotypes found no evidence of association between APOE and WMH (graded WMH dichotomous pooled OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78 -1.21; graded WMH continuous pooled standardized mean difference: 0.30, 95% CI, Ϫ0.02-0.62; WMH volume pooled standardized mean difference: 0.15, 95%CI Ϫ0.04 to 0.33).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this association has been denied by one community study [27]. Studies evaluating the association between the ε4 apoE genotype and WMC in community samples [28, 29], in patients with Alzheimer’s disease [30, 31]and in a twin cohort [32], are consistently negative with one exception [33]. …”
Section: Wmc and Genetically Transmitted Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%