2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-017-3439-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does aquatic invasive species removal benefit native fish? The response of gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum) to commercial harvest of bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and silver carp (H. molitrix)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparatively, the upper river has a considerably lower silver carp density due to intensive removal efforts by contracted commercial fishers (e.g. Love et al 2018) and a population that is mainly comprised of lower-river migrants (ACRCC 2020). Moreover, bigheaded carp (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, the upper river has a considerably lower silver carp density due to intensive removal efforts by contracted commercial fishers (e.g. Love et al 2018) and a population that is mainly comprised of lower-river migrants (ACRCC 2020). Moreover, bigheaded carp (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive fishes feeding at lower trophic levels often exploit resources used by native fishes (Flecker & Townsend, ), sometimes to the point of competitively excluding native species (e.g., Douglas, Marsh, & Minckley, ). Interestingly, gizzard shad condition is rebounding in the upper Illinois River, where intensive commercial harvest of Asian carp occurs (MacNamara et al., ), but continues to decrease in the lower Illinois River, where only limited harvest occurs (Love, Lederman, Haun, DeBoer, & Casper, ). We believe the invasive bigheaded carps’ overall influence on adult native fishes is still limited (sensu Matthews, Marsh‐Matthews, Cashner, & Gelwick, ), as organisms and ecosystems respond to stressors in stages (Selye, ) with lag periods often present (Crooks, ; Simberloff, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Love et al. ). Consequently, established populations of Bighead Carp and Silver Carp have negatively impacted native aquatic ecosystems within the Mississippi River basin (Solomon et al.…”
Section: Locations and Number (N) Of Bighead Carp And Silver Carp Capmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Range expansion of Bighead Carp and Silver Carp has caused great concern amongst Mississippi River basin fisheries managers because they are highly fecund (Schrank and Guy 2002;Williamson and Garvey 2005), exhibit rapid growth rates (Williamson and Garvey 2005), and can rapidly disperse (DeGrandchamp et al 2008). Furthermore, Bighead Carp and Silver Carp are voracious planktivores capable of consuming 20% of their body weight per day (Kolar et al 2007) allowing them to outcompete native adult and juvenile planktivores for food (Pendleton et al 2017;Love et al 2018). Consequently, established populations of Bighead Carp and Silver Carp have negatively impacted native aquatic ecosystems within the Mississippi River basin (Solomon et al 2016;DeBoer et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%