Does ASEAN–India Trade Stimulate Income? A Cointegration Analysis Using the ARDL Approach

Nambiar, Shankaran; Balasubramaniam, Arunnan

doi:10.1177/1391561416657469

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, skill and competencies, level of training and organizational development. besides, in the developing countries, level of FDI has significant and impact on the economic growth ((De Mello, 1999;Nambiar & Balasubramaniam, 2016).…”

Section: Positive Impact Of Fdi On Manufacturing Sector Growthmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Foreign Direct Investment and Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan

Rahman¹,

Bakar²

2018

Pak. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study is to explore the insights of the literature on foreign direct investment (FDI) toward manufacturing industry in the context of developing economies. This paper examines and synthesizes existing theoretical and empirical literature on said issue. It first draws the overview of the FDI and manufacturing sector in Pakistan. Second, it identifies the literature based on the theoretical and empirical insights from the published literature. In addition, this article put light on theoretical methods that describes how/ why these methods work. Third, this article proposes three fruitful dimensions for further research. This paper contributes to the area of FDI and manufacturing sector growth by critically analyzing and synthesizing existing theory and research on FDI and growth of manufacturing sector.

show abstract

Section: Positive Impact Of Fdi On Manufacturing Sector Growthmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Foreign Direct Investment and Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan

Rahman¹,

Bakar²

2018

Pak. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous literature has primarily focused on whether regionalism promotes or undermines the multilateral trading system underpinned by the basic principles of WTO (Baldwin, 2008; Bhagwati, 1992; Pomfret, 2021). Moreover, a few studies have investigated India’s individual RTAs with ASEAN (Banik & Kim, 2020; Kipgen, 2020; Nambiar & Balasubramaniam, 2016; Sikdar & Nag, 2011), European Union (Khorana & Narayanan, 2017; Khorana & Perdikis, 2010), Bangladesh (Kim et al, 2014; Siriwardana & Yang, 2007), South Korea (John, 2020), Japan (Bhattacharyay & Mukhopadhyay, 2015), and the Gulf Cooperation Council (Ismail & Ahmed, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regionalism or Multilateralism: Evidence from India

Kathjoo

Fazili

2022

South Asia Economic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With an impasse at Doha round of negotiations, many countries started to change their course of economic liberalization from generic policies of multilateralism to regional trade agreements (RTAs). In this scenario, India plausibly lacks the presence and will of concluding such agreements with some of its major trading partners while being sceptical about the existing ones. Using structural gravity, this study has quantified the impact of country-specific globalization levels and RTAs on international trade among India and its 32 major trading partners. Unlike a plethora of studies employing the gravity model on Indian trade policy issues, we have made use of many recent advancements in gravity modelling. Our methodology robust to the use of intra-national trade data, two alternative estimators, and multiple scenarios naturally addresses the endogeneity issues that are prominent with trade policy variables like RTAs. The empirical results reveal that RTAs have a comparatively strong impact in promoting trade among sample countries. However, country-specific globalization levels measured by the KOF globalization index have a very negligible impact on promoting trade among sample countries. Furthermore, we have obtained very slight asymmetries across the impact of country-specific globalization levels on exports versus imports of mid-income countries with high-income countries. JEL Codes: F1, F14, F15, F60, F68

show abstract