2019
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00923-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does attribute amnesia occur with the presentation of complex, meaningful stimuli? The answer is, “it depends”

Abstract: Attribute amnesia (AA) is a recently reported phenomenon whereby participants are unable to report a salient attribute of a stimulus (e.g., the color or identity of a target letter) on which their attention has just been focused during a prior task. This counterintuitive effect has been repeatedly replicated with various simple stimuli such as digits and letters. The current study sought to explore boundaries of AA by investigating whether the phenomenon persists when participants encounter complex, meaningful… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
41
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
6
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, future research should scrutinize the phenomenon in which observers report that fully visible items did not appear even though VWM was not full (e.g., Chen et al, 2019). This seems to be an intriguing and unexpected effect as one would expect that four real-world, visually distinct objects should be easily remembered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, future research should scrutinize the phenomenon in which observers report that fully visible items did not appear even though VWM was not full (e.g., Chen et al, 2019). This seems to be an intriguing and unexpected effect as one would expect that four real-world, visually distinct objects should be easily remembered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The current findings also have crucial implications in better understanding the underlying mechanism of the recently discovered phenomenon of attribute amnesia 34,[63][64][65] . In a typical attribute amnesia experiment, participants were asked to report the location of the target item from a search set of four items (e.g., a target letter among distractor numbers).…”
Section: Attention and Forgettingmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Experiment 2 was designed to test whether the finding of Experiment 1 could be generalized when adopting more complex and meaningful stimuli (i.e., Chinese characters). It could be possible that attribute amnesia would be eliminated or reduced when using complex, meaningful stimuli, as many previous studies showed that participants exhibited an advantage for processing and/or remembering these stimuli (e.g., Brady, Konkle, Alvarez, & Oliva, 2008;Chen, Yu, et al, 2019;Potter, Nieuwenstein, & Strohminger, 2008). Liu, Shu, & Li, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The no-overflow view claimed that information outside attentional focus cannot be consciously perceived or reported (e.g., CB and IB) while overflow view argues that even the unattended information could sometimes be phenomenally experienced and reportable (e.g., cuing method in Sperling's task). Unlike the abovementioned debate focusing on unattended information, the current study sought to further address the debate from a new perspective, through directly testing whether fully attended supraliminal information is necessarily reportable by adopting a variation of the recently developed paradigm of attribute amnesia (Chen & Wyble, 2015Chen, Yan, et al, 2019;Chen, Yu, et al, 2019). Despite it has been explicitly or implicitly assumed that fully attended information would be consciously perceived and reportable (De Brigard & Prinz, 2010;Marchetti, 2012), it remains unknown whether this assumption must be true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%