2018
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1494952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does ball carrier technique influence tackler head injury assessment risk in elite rugby union?

Abstract: The aim of this study was to use video evidence of tackles in elite level rugby union to identify ball carrier proficiency characteristics, for both lower and upper body tackles, that have a higher propensity to result in Head Injury Assessments(HIA) for the tackler. HIA (n = 74) and non-HIA tackles (n = 233) were categorised as either front-on or side-on upper or lower body tackles and scored for ball carrying proficiency characteristics. Side-on tackles included tackles from behind. A Chi-Square test (p < 0.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, for comparison, the MBIM method could have been conducted on a tackle with similar closing speeds that occurred lower down on the body of an unaware ball carrier. 37 The closing speeds in this case study were similar to the average closing speeds measured in elite level rugby union. 38 Access to multiple camera view-synchronised video footage directly from the sports broadcaster could have allowed more cases to be analysed.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Ideally, for comparison, the MBIM method could have been conducted on a tackle with similar closing speeds that occurred lower down on the body of an unaware ball carrier. 37 The closing speeds in this case study were similar to the average closing speeds measured in elite level rugby union. 38 Access to multiple camera view-synchronised video footage directly from the sports broadcaster could have allowed more cases to be analysed.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In instances where players make contact with the ball‐carrier as second tacklers, there was a 70% reduction in concussion risk (OR = 0.30). In front‐on tackles, the forceful impact had a high propensity to result in an HIA among the tacklers . Therefore, in instances where second tacklers attempted to stop penetration by the ball‐carrier, the movement of the ball‐carrier was already restricted; thus, making it difficult for the ball‐carrier to have a powerful contact, which is a risk of concussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the video data was in the public domain, ethical approval was not required, similar to previous rugby union video analysis studies. [16][17][18] A ruck was defined as a phase of play where at least one player from each team are in contact, on their feet and over the ball which is on the ground. 5 Ruck frequency was cross-referenced through statistics providers Match Stats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%