2017
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mux018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Benchmarking Encourage Improvement or Convergence? Evaluating North Carolina’s Fiscal Benchmarking Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 18. Given that these performance audits use benchmarking with peer districts, these results appear consistent with the results of Gerrish and Spreen (2017), which finds that local governments in North Carolina spend down their cash reserves following the introduction of a state fiscal benchmarking program. …”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“… 18. Given that these performance audits use benchmarking with peer districts, these results appear consistent with the results of Gerrish and Spreen (2017), which finds that local governments in North Carolina spend down their cash reserves following the introduction of a state fiscal benchmarking program. …”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The variation in unrestricted net assets is larger than that in the unassigned general fund balances. Similar to Gerrish and Spreen (2017), we may be observing a form of isomorphism in financial management when professional benchmarks of holding at least two months of operating spending in general fund reserves produce regression to the mean, whereas the lack of professional benchmarks with regards to unrestricted net assets results in less uniform practices (Figure 1). Figure 2 presents the distributions of both DVs and shows a moderate positive skew for unassigned fund balances and a mild negative skew for unrestricted net assets.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 75%
“…A local government's need for fiscal reserves may also be driven by the financial management practices of its neighbors, shared economic environments (Guo and Wang 2017), and financial performance standards propagated by states (Gerrish and Spreen 2017;Ványolós 2011). Though not being able to test the proximity hypothesis using spatial data similar to Guo and Wang (2017) or the hypothesis about financial performance convergence within states over time similar to Gerrish and Spreen (2017), we take a state-fixed effects approach similar to Thompson et al (2017). We interpret the share of variation explained by state fixed effects as evidence of the importance of state-level environments for local fiscal reserves accumulation (H5).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, perceptions of behavior may differ from perceptions about other aspects like administrative systems. Second, previous studies have debated whether benchmarking (i.e., providing information about localities’ positions relative to their peers) encourages improvement or convergence in local performance (Gerrish and Spreen 2017; Pasha 2018). Although this study's evidence is too short term to produce conclusive results, our findings may support both convergence and improvement; on average, there was an improvement in performance among low performers, and, as a result, the performance gaps across localities diminished.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%