2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1361813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Beta Move with News? Firm-Specific Information Flows and Learning About Profitability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
43
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
9
43
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the figures show that betas are relatively stable before warning announcements, increase substantially on the announcement dates and stabilise thereafter. In contrast to Patton and Verardo (2012), our results suggest that betas do not revert back to the pre-announcement average over the 10-day window following warning announcements.…”
Section: Time-varying Betascontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, the figures show that betas are relatively stable before warning announcements, increase substantially on the announcement dates and stabilise thereafter. In contrast to Patton and Verardo (2012), our results suggest that betas do not revert back to the pre-announcement average over the 10-day window following warning announcements.…”
Section: Time-varying Betascontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…In untabulated results, we find that the changes in the betas of the control stocks around the warning events are not significantly different from zero, implying that the increase in the post-warning betas is more likely to be caused by the arrival of news than the systematic time-varying nature of stock betas. This evidence is consistent with Kalay and Lowenstein (1985), Brown et al (1988) and Patton and Verardo (2012), who show that, as surprises increase uncertainty, systematic risk increases significantly in the aftermath of both positive and negative news. Hence, ignoring the time-varying nature of the betas may result in biased abnormal return estimates.…”
Section: Time-varying Betassupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this evidence indicates that non-diversifiable price risk increases at earnings announcements, these studies do not establish a link between the increase in betas and realized announcement returns. Ball and Kothari (1991) and Hsieh, Jerris, and Kross (1999) test for such a link but do not find one; Patton and Verardo (2012) do not test for such a link. Thus, similar to other tests of the CAPM, these studies do not provide evidence that investors pay premiums to hedge increases in non-diversifiable price risk at earnings announcements.…”
Section: Non-diversifiable Volatility Risk and Risk Premiums At Earnimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies focus on price risk and examine whether CAPM betas increase at earnings announcements. For example, Ball and Kothari (1991), Hsieh, Jerris, and Kross (1999), and Patton and Verardo (2012) provide evidence that CAPM betas increase at earnings announcements. Although this evidence indicates that non-diversifiable price risk increases at earnings announcements, these studies do not establish a link between the increase in betas and realized announcement returns.…”
Section: Non-diversifiable Volatility Risk and Risk Premiums At Earnimentioning
confidence: 99%