Does board diversity reduce the likelihood of financial distress in the presence of a powerful Chinese CEO?

Abstract

PurposeThis paper empirically investigates the impact of board diversity in terms of demographic and cognitive dimensions on financial distress likelihood in an emerging Chinese market to explore whether the Chief Executive Officers' (CEOs) power moderates the relationship between board diversity and the probability of financial distress.Design/methodology/approachTo test the hypothesized relationships, demographic diversity through gender, age and nationality, and cognitive diversity through education, expertise and tenure, are taken as independent variables to investigate their impact on the probability of financial distress measured by the Altman China Z score. Data is collected for 13,740 firm-year observations from 2009 to 2018. This study employs panel data regression under fixed effect assumptions. Further, to control the possible endogeneity issue, this study uses a two-step System Generalized Methods of Moments (GMM) model as a robust check.FindingsThe results reveal that board diversity is positively associated with financial distress Z score, suggesting that diverse boards are helpful in reducing the likelihood of financial distress. Moreover, CEO power positively moderates this relationship. It means that board diversity, in the presence of powerful CEOs, is more effective in reducing financial distress likelihood by controlling the wrong financial decisions taken by top executives to reap personal benefits. Further, the robustness model confirms the relationship between board diversity and the probability of financial distress.Originality/valueTo the best of researchers' knowledge, this is one of the earliest studies to investigate board diversity by constructing demographic and cognitive board diversity indexes as a determinant of financial distress likelihood in China. Further, researchers found no study in the literature using CEO power as a contextual variable on the relationship between board diversity and financial distress.

Tax planning and financial default: role of corporate life cycle

“…It shows that cash resources from tax planning are managed in distinctive ways in each life cycle stage, thereby having a varied impact on the likelihood of default. Our study sheds light on the underexplored non-VRIO cash resources, and highlights the potential linkages between the agency theory and RBV (Luu, 2023;Ali et al, 2023).…”

“…We use another measure of the dependent variable and replicate the analysis. We use the Altman Z-score (Altman, 1968;Ali et al, 2023) [9] as an alternative to financial default. The results remained consistent with our main findings (untabulated).…”

Technology Integration in Predicting Financial Performance: Big Data, Intellectual Capital, and Board Diversity

“…It has been shown that having a diverse board of directors can help businesses make better decisions, be more innovative, and perform better financially. Research on the function of diverse boards in developing nations is necessary, as the majority of the material currently in publication focuses on industrialized nations [28], [29], [30]. This research gap necessitates studies that are appropriate for the setting of emerging nations, accounting for variations in culture, institutions, and regulations.…”