2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-020-01474-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does bone scintigraphy still have a role in the era of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we noticed a relatively low equivocal examination rate, with only 7 patients (6%) classified as doubtful for the presence of bone metastases, while the remaining patients were immediately categorized as positive or negative. These results are in accordance with those of Helyar et al who reported an 8% rate of equivocal lesions according to SPECT/CT and a significantly reduced rate of equivocal lesions in comparison with that of planar BS alone [40].…”
Section: Diagnostic Performance Of Whole-body Bone Spect/ctsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we noticed a relatively low equivocal examination rate, with only 7 patients (6%) classified as doubtful for the presence of bone metastases, while the remaining patients were immediately categorized as positive or negative. These results are in accordance with those of Helyar et al who reported an 8% rate of equivocal lesions according to SPECT/CT and a significantly reduced rate of equivocal lesions in comparison with that of planar BS alone [40].…”
Section: Diagnostic Performance Of Whole-body Bone Spect/ctsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…PSMA has recently become a very promising target for the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with PC. PSMA-PET/CT was shown to outperform planar BS and bone SPECT/CT for the detection of bone metastases [24,40] and FCH PET/CT for the number of detected bone metastases and for the overall number of identified recurrence sites [22], especially in patients presenting with low, < 2 ng/mL PSA levels. Indeed, the AUC of WB bone SPECT/CT and FCH PET/CT were comparable in our study and both were equivalent to the AUC observed by Pyka et al [24] for WB bone SPECT/CT whereas the authors found a significantly better AUC for PSMA PET/CT.…”
Section: Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, local staging is limited to surgery field, and distant metastases are frequently missed with standard imaging modalities which have limited sensitivity for PCa metastasis (4,5,27). The diagnostic superiority of PSMA PET has been shown in comparison studies previously (9,28,29). In agreement with those studies, PSMA PET showed at least one local/metastatic lesion in 64.5% of patients with persisting detectable PSA after RP in a prospective study (30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Overall, PSMA PET had an impact on therapy management in 23.9% of patients, even where abdominopelvic imaging and BS were present. Recently, we published a comparative study revealing that PSMA PET has significantly higher sensitivity and specificity for detection of BS, compared with BS and BS+SPECT/ CT (9). The sensitivity and specificity were 100-97.7% for PSMA PET in the staging group, 38.8-51.1% for BS and 428-81.8% for BS+SPECT/CT based on lesion analysis, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation