Does brand attachment protect consumer–brand relationships after brand misconduct in retail banking?

Abstract

PurposeThis research aims to examine the role of consumers' brand trust and attachment on advocacy intention before and after the occurrence of brand misconduct in retail banking. In addition, the influence of brand attachment on consumers' willingness to switch, advocate for and forgive brands is examined in a post-misconduct scenario.Design/methodology/approachData were collected through a self-administered online survey questionnaire. A total of 304 valid and usable responses from Australian participants were analysed using IBM SPSS 27.0.FindingsThe findings reveal that brand attachment mediates the positive relationship between trust and advocacy intention. Furthermore, brand attachment (1) dilutes consumers' switching intention and (2) strengthens their willingness to forgive the bank after misconduct.Practical implicationsResults suggest that retail banks should create strong brand attachments with their consumers. In addition to brand trust, brand attachment will generate greater advocacy intention among consumers. Moreover, practitioners in retail banking can leverage brand attachment to mitigate the negative impact of brand misconduct.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to examine the impact of brand attachment on the consumer–bank relationship within the context of brand misconduct. The study is also unique in its analysis of the mediating role of brand attachment between brand trust and advocacy. This research further adds to the current literature by suggesting that strong and positive customer connections to the brand facilitate communication and marketing efforts after brand misconduct and that these are effective in maintaining consumer-bank relationship.

Examining the Dynamics of Fashion Trends, Self-Brand Congruence, and Consumer Engagement, with a Mediating Lens on Brand Trust in Customer-Brand Relationships

“…Moreover, the study's findings on what fashion trends mean for consumer trust in brands and the subsequent customer-brand relationship validate the ongoing conversation about what trends mean for consumer behavior (Shimul et al, 2023). Consumers see brands and shape relationships through fashion trends, which frequently serve as a platform for self-expression and character construction.…”

The role of brand self-congruence, brand love and brand attachment on brand advocacy: a serial mediation model

“…While a brand is considered a relationship partner to the consumers, they are willing to patronise the brand through repeat purchases, positive word-of-mouth and recommendations across online and offline platforms (Park et al ., 2010). Moreover, brand love and attachment motivate consumers to defend the brand against public opprobrium (Wilk et al ., 2018; Shimul et al ., 2023). Our research further reveals that consumers' love for brands results in brand attachment.…”

“…Park et al, 2010;Mal€ ar et al, 2011;Boateng et al, 2020). Such an emotional bond provides the consumers with a sense of belongingness, security and happiness (Cacioppo and Patrick, 2008;Shimul et al, 2023), whereby the consumers seek to continue the mutual relationship for a more extended time (Shimul and Phau, 2022). Consequently, they share their brand-related positive experience with others and then recommend the brand (Japutra et al, 2019;Jillapalli and Wilcox, 2010).…”

Brand Credibility: Navigating the Pathway to Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty

“…If the perceived celebrity credibility is higher (i.e., the celebrity is perceived to possess remarkable persuasive skills, be proficient in delivering and communicating messages, and be trusted by the general public), then the celebrity will be able to influence and mold public opinion towards a specific TV program and hence the audience will be motivated to consume that particular TV program. Shimul, Faroque, and Cheah (2023) demonstrated in their study that brand credibility and brand attachment mitigate the impact of brand crisis on customers' product evaluation which in turn leads to enhanced purchase intentions. The more the brand is credible, expertise and the more the customer is attached to the brand, the less the impact of brand crisis on the customer's brand evaluation (i.e.…”