Does Buddhist Tourism Successfully Result in Local Sustainable Development?

Abstract

At nine of China’s most well-known Buddhist attractions, the role of Buddhist tourism is examined in terms of two major pillars of local sustainable development, which include local economic growth and local environmental quality. Using the year and city-fixed effect models, and by employing the panel data over the period 2010–2019, we performed an empirical analysis in this investigation. The empirical results suggest that Buddhist tourism positively affects local economic growth. Specifically, a 1% increase in Buddhist tourism results in a 0.053% increase in local economic growth. On the contrary, the empirical results suggest that Buddhist tourism negatively affects local environmental quality. Concretely, a 1% increase in Buddhist tourism leads to a 0.089% decline in local environmental quality. Furthermore, using the number of Buddhist tourists that arrived to replace the total Buddhist tourism revenue to re-estimate the effects of Buddhist tourism on local sustainable development as a robustness test, the new results support the previous results. Meanwhile, other factor with significant impacts on local sustainable development have been found. To conclude, because local economic growth and local environmental conservation are mutually exclusive, which limits local sustainable development, this paper provides evidence for local policymakers to realize local sustainable development from the perspective of Buddhist tourism.

Resident’s perceptions towards tourism development in Buddha’s footsteps in India

“…The most significant study and studies on local perception were then developed. He and Wang (2022) learned that Buddhist tourism has a positive impact on regional economic development; for example, if Buddhist tourism grows by 1%, local economic development will expand by 0.053%.…”

Renewable Energy Consumption: Does It Matter for China’s Sustainable Development?

“…For example, Ridzuan et al [24] achieved sustainable development by focusing on economic growth, income distribution, and the condition of the environment. Yumashev et al [25] and He and Wang [26] utilized the human development index as an indicator of the level of sustainable development. The adjusted net savings were utilized by Rahman et al [27] and Wu et al [28] as a measure of sustainable development.…”