2017
DOI: 10.1177/0899764017703710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Charity Begin at Home or Overseas?

Abstract: Abstract:We conduct a field experiment to analyse whether a representative sample of the population has a preference for giving money to an international development charity or to a charity helping families in need in the home country. The majority of participants reveal a preference for giving to the local charity, rather than the international development charity.Participants were given the option of commenting on why they chose the charity they did, and we conduct a qualitative analysis of these responses. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between various demographic factors and charitable giving have been widely investigated (Bekkers andWiepking 2011b, Knowles andSullivan 2017;Lwin et al 2014). Whilst the aim of this paper was not specifically to these demographic factors, our data did indicate some statistically significant relationships; younger age groups, women and respondents from Northern Ireland reported higher levels of charitable cosmopolitanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relationship between various demographic factors and charitable giving have been widely investigated (Bekkers andWiepking 2011b, Knowles andSullivan 2017;Lwin et al 2014). Whilst the aim of this paper was not specifically to these demographic factors, our data did indicate some statistically significant relationships; younger age groups, women and respondents from Northern Ireland reported higher levels of charitable cosmopolitanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In their recent assessment of charitable giving, Knowles and Sullivan (2017) provide a candid assessment of the challenges presented in ensuring a voluntary, random sample is representative of its parent population and is sufficiently large in absolute terms. The data generated in this study by means of quota sampling are arguably more representative to its setting than that generated by the Knowles and Sullivan (2017) research based in New Zealand.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Findings: Stagementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Giving to international development could be low due to there being fewer international development charities than charities with a domestic focus. In a field experiment controlling for this number of charities effect in New Zealand, Knowles and Sullivan (2017) give participants the choice of donating to an international development charity (INGO) or a charity helping people in New Zealand and find 28% of participants choose the INGO. Therefore, even when the number of charities effect is controlled for, a significant majority still choose the charity with a domestic focus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is evident in observational, survey and experimental data (e.g. Knowles and Sullivan, 2017;Casale and Baumann, 2015;Micklewright and Schnepf, 2009;Giving USA, 2017), implying a declining radius of altruism. In this paper, we analyse whether this declining radius of altruism also applies within countries; that is, are domestic charities given equal preference or do people prefer to give to local charities (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…One possible reason why charities with an overseas focus receive a low share of private donations could be what Knowles and Sullivan (2017) term the number of charities effect.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%