Money in Motion 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-24525-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Circulation Need a Monetary Standard?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But it does allow the specification of the differential between central bank money and private liabilities in terms of the discount rate and the market interest rate. Deleplace (1994c) notes that stability of the standard requires r ≥ i* ≥ 0, where r is the official discount rate (which represents the equivalent of the mint costs of converting bullion into coin) and i* the rate of interest in the money market. Current money market conditions however, appear to be reversed, with r ≤ i*≤ 0, which, if I have interpreted Deleplace correctly, means that the cost of seigniorage is negative, leading not to a depreciation of currency, or better an expansion of bank reserves and an increased demand for them, via conversion of debt into reserves.…”
Section: Modern Monetary Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it does allow the specification of the differential between central bank money and private liabilities in terms of the discount rate and the market interest rate. Deleplace (1994c) notes that stability of the standard requires r ≥ i* ≥ 0, where r is the official discount rate (which represents the equivalent of the mint costs of converting bullion into coin) and i* the rate of interest in the money market. Current money market conditions however, appear to be reversed, with r ≤ i*≤ 0, which, if I have interpreted Deleplace correctly, means that the cost of seigniorage is negative, leading not to a depreciation of currency, or better an expansion of bank reserves and an increased demand for them, via conversion of debt into reserves.…”
Section: Modern Monetary Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En definitiva, "la moneda como un elemento fundamental y permanente [...] es en lo que uno cuenta y en lo que uno paga" 9 (Deleplace 2007, p 8, cf. también Boyer-Xambeu et al, 1990Deleplace, 1996). Apoyándonos en esta concepción de la moneda en el análisis monetario, es posible dar una representación básica de la actividad económica que no haga referencia a los mercados equilibrados: una red de pagos en evolución.…”
Section: Naturaleza Y Papel De La Moneda En Un Análisis Monetariounclassified
“…Money issued by commercial banks is connected to money issued by the Central Bank (by a convertibility constraint for example). 22 Commercial banks aim at doing profits granting credits (private interest), but the Central Bank is responsible of the system of payment perpetuity, determining monetary interest rate (Aglietta, 1996, Cartelier, 1996b, Deleplace, 1996, Renversez, 1996.…”
Section: B Endogenous Money An Interesting Perspective?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our opinion, this unitary theory prolongs circuitist approach, even if those visions of economy are different (Benetti and Cartelier conception is disintegrated because of price rule of Cantillon, contrary to that of circuitists). It allows to consider credit as a particular case of a payment system which principles are more general and to extend certain circuitist properties and logic to metal payment system (Cartelier, 1996b, Deleplace, 1996.…”
Section: Theory Of System Of Payment As Alternative Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%