Does climate change influence people’s migration decisions in Maldives?

Abstract

The influence of climate change and perceptions of it on people's migration decisions has received significant prominence, especially for people living on low-lying islands. To contribute to this literature, this paper uses Maldives as a case study for exploring the research question: How does climate change influence or not influence people's migration decisions in Maldives? Previous work tends to start from a disciplinary climate change perspective, while this study combines migration, mobility, and island studies perspectives, within which climate change sits. As well, rather than focusing on the area around the capital, Malé, as with many previous studies, the 113 interviews here were conducted in eight islands across three atolls. The method was qualitative, semistructured, face-to-face interviews using purposive sampling of ordinary people. Contrary to a view of islanders preparing to flee their islands as "climate change refugees", the interviewees provided nuanced and varied responses. They rarely identified the potential of future impacts due to climate change as influencing their migration-related decisions. When migration was considered, it was chiefly internal movement seeking a better standard of living via improved services, better living conditions, and more job opportunities. If migration related to potential climate change impacts might happen, then it was assumed to be in the future for decisions then. This lack of influence of climate change-related perceptions on Maldivians' migration decisions fits well within island mobilities studies, from which climate change perspectives could adopt wider contexts.

Rethinking Reef Island Stability in Relation to Anthropogenic Sea Level Rise

“…A more radical approach to adaptation supports in‐country migration by raising the elevation of existing islands (Bordner et al, 2020) and constructing artificial islands (Brown et al, 2019). Although migration decisions across atoll nations have largely been driven by education, work, and healthcare (Kelman et al, 2019; van der Geest et al, 2020), within RMI, population‐scale migration is not favored (Bordner et al, 2020). Instead, Marshallese leaders are committed to adapt in place to protect the sovereignty and identity of their people (Bordner et al, 2020).…”

The Subjective Climate Migrant: Climate Perceptions, Their Determinants, and Relationship to Migration in Cambodia

“…The findings reported here have implications for the literature on climate change and migration (e.g., Jacobson 1988;Myers 1997Myers , 2002; International Organisation for Migration 2019) because of their implications for the strength and directness of the relationship between climate change, the perception of climate change, and action in response to perceived climate change. In some cases, climate change has been viewed as driver of migration (McLeman and Hunter 2010;Black et al 2011), whereas in others (Mortreux and Barnett 2009;Kelman et al 2019) it has been viewed as a less significant factor. Nevertheless, the debate is characterized by the assumption that the perception and physical incidence of climate change are covariant, a premise that is rendered problematic by the intermediary role of livelihoods.…”

Not a Security Issue: How Policy Experts De-Politicize the Climate Change–Migration Nexus

“…The frame of security already in term of 'climate refugees' has been very influential in policy areas (Bettini et al 2016). The "refugee" and "forced migration" trope highlights the supposed situation of movement being involuntary and leaving one's country of origin directly because of impacts from climate change (Kelman et al 2019). There also remains a significant issue of those who are less likely to move in the face of environmental change and may be trapped in areas that expose them to serious risk.…”