2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Combined Antegrade–Retrograde Cardioplegia Have Any Superiority Over Antegrade Cardioplegia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, limited data were available, and the methodology of monitoring was different since we had used a Swan-Ganz catheter. Additionally, a previous study highlighted improved cardiac protection with a combination of antegrade and retrograde perfusion that enhanced the distribution of cardioplegia [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, limited data were available, and the methodology of monitoring was different since we had used a Swan-Ganz catheter. Additionally, a previous study highlighted improved cardiac protection with a combination of antegrade and retrograde perfusion that enhanced the distribution of cardioplegia [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retrograde route is particularly interesting in the setting of critical coronary stenosis, severe aortic insufficiency, or other conditions that may alter the antegrade delivery of cardioplegia [1][2][3]. Actually, the mode of delivering cardioplegia depends on the preference of the surgeons, and retrograde cardioplegia is often combined with antegrade delivery to enhance the myocardial protection [4]. Additionally, many surgical reports validated interesting results in redo valvular procedures using a continuous retrograde perfusion of oxygenated blood via the coronary sinus, which allows to perform beating-heart valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and decreases the risk of ischemia-reperfusion injury [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the knowledge that the anterior cardiac veins supplying the RV are not directly connected to the coronary sinus and thus may lead to a suboptimal distribution of the cardioplegic solution to the RV [ 12 ],[ 13 ] Kaukoranta et al [ 28 ] conducted a small study on patients undergoing CABG surgery and receiving either antegrade or retrograde cardioplegia and reported that, despite more significant ischaemic changes within the RV in the retrograde cardioplegia group, no post-operative complication related to the retrograde route was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this technique, the cardioplegic solution is distributed to the cardiac microstructure through a transmural network of veins that is independent to flow-limiting lesions [ 11 ]. Nevertheless, retrograde cardioplegia presents important potential limitations, which could in part explain the reason why its use remains still relatively limited: the anterior cardiac veins supplying the right ventricle (RV) are not directly connected to the coronary sinus and this may lead to a suboptimal distribution of the cardioplegic solution to the RV [ 12 ],[ 13 ]; accurate cannulation of the coronary sinus is crucial as failure in this might lead to the distribution of the cardioplegic solution to the right atrium and not to the venous system; the perfusion pressure requires very close monitoring, as too low a pressure suggests misplacement of the cannula, and too high a pressure can cause rupture of the coronary sinus [ 14 ],[ 15 ]. These potential issues can generally be avoided by care and precision by the surgeon; the delay in arresting the heart due to slow retrograde perfusion if retrograde cardioplegia is used alone (lower flow rates and pressures used to prevent coronary sinus damage and myocardial oedema) [ 16 ],[ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation