Commentary on: Curtis JR, Back AL, Ford DW, et al. Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness: a randomised trial. JAMA 2013;310:2271-81.
ContextSignificant energy and resources have been devoted to the development of end-of-life (EOL) communication skills training programmes for healthcare providers.Development of these programmes is supported by evidence that patients who communicate with their providers about EOL care receive less aggressive care, early hospice enrollment and experience better quality of life at EOL. 1 However, while palliative care communication skills training programmes improve providers' communication skills, 2 preliminary studies indicate that training does not affect patient-reported outcomes. 3 This randomised trial examined the relationship between provider participation in a palliative care communication skills training programme, and patient-reported, family-reported and healthcare provider-reported outcomes.
MethodsInternal medicine residents, subspecialty fellows, and nurse practitioners were randomly assigned to a simulation-based, communication skills intervention (n=232) or usual education (n=240). The intervention consisted of eight 4 h sessions that included didactics, skills practice (using simulated patient encounters) and reflective discussions. The primary outcome was the quality of communication (QOC); secondary outcomes included the quality of EOL care (QEOLC), patient and family member depression, and patient functional status. Measures were completed by patients and family members who had encounters with participants and clinicians who observed care provided by participants in 6 months before or 10 months after the intervention.
FindingsIntervention participation was not significantly associated with QOC after covariate adjustment across evaluators ( p=0.15-0.94). In post hoc subgroup analyses, the intervention was not associated with QOC in outpatients (b=0.041, 95% CI −1.36 to 1.44), but was associated with QOC improvement for patients with 'poor' self-reported health status (b=1.43, 95% CI 0.28 to 2.58). Similarly, the intervention was not associated with QEOLC across evaluators ( p=0.20-0.88), patient physical status ( p=0.32), mental status ( p=0.82) or family member depression ( p=0.33) in adjusted analyses. However, the intervention was associated with a significant increase in patient depressive symptom severity from preintervention to postintervention ( p=0.006).
CommentaryThese results are consistent with previous findings that communication skills training programmes are not associated with patient outcomes. Why do communication skills training programmes fail to impact patient well-being and perceptions of clinical care?We noted that the methodological characteristics may account for these results. However, we would like to propose two alternative explanations. The first is the potential role of the patient-provider therapeutic alliance (TA). TA is the collabor...