2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11414-014-9392-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Competitive Work Improve Quality of Life for Adults with Severe Mental Illness? Evidence from a Randomized Trial of Supported Employment

Abstract: A randomized trial comparing a facility-based Clubhouse (N=83) to a mobile Program of Assertive Community Treatment (PACT; N=84) tested the widely held belief that competitive employment improves global quality of life for adults with severe mental illness. Random regression analyses showed that, over 24 months of study participation, competitively employed Clubhouse participants reported greater global quality of life improvement, particularly with the social and financial aspects of their lives, as well as g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“… p < 0.05 Proportion Re-hospitalized: A smaller proportion of Clubhouse members were re-hospitalized at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Persons referred to other community services 74 (40 Clubhouse, 34 comparison); all had been hospitalized in the prior 4 months p < 0.05 (6, 12, 24 months) p < 0.02 (18 months) Gold et al ( 2016 ) Global Quality of Life: Clubhouse participants reported greater global quality of life improvement, particularly with the social and financial aspects of their lives, as well as greater self-esteem. Clubhouse participants who worked a competitive job reported greater service satisfaction compared to other Clubhouse participants.…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… p < 0.05 Proportion Re-hospitalized: A smaller proportion of Clubhouse members were re-hospitalized at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Persons referred to other community services 74 (40 Clubhouse, 34 comparison); all had been hospitalized in the prior 4 months p < 0.05 (6, 12, 24 months) p < 0.02 (18 months) Gold et al ( 2016 ) Global Quality of Life: Clubhouse participants reported greater global quality of life improvement, particularly with the social and financial aspects of their lives, as well as greater self-esteem. Clubhouse participants who worked a competitive job reported greater service satisfaction compared to other Clubhouse participants.…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… p = 0.327 Employment hours: Clubhouse members worked less hours. p = 0.003 Evidence on Effects of Clubhouse * Clubhouse Accredited by Clubhouse International ** Clubhouse Adheres to Standards and/or had Fidelity Check a Participants from a single study, (the EIDP), were used in separate analyses for all five publications: (Macias et al 2001 ) n = 166, (Macias et al 2006 ) n = 174, Schonebaum et al ( 2006 ) n = 170, (Schonebaum and Boyd 2012 ; Schonebaum et al 2006 ) n = 43, (Johnsen et al 2004 ) n = 175, (Gold et al 2016 ), n = 167 …”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since it connotes a contribution to society, it breaks the selfstigma, offers the opportunity to free people from financial dependence on others (or non-contributory pensions), opens the door to more rewarding relationships based on reciprocity and shared responsibility and the effective exercise of the adult role. Competitive employment, from the health perspective, has been linked to a series of psychosocial benefits, such as improving personal income, increasing self-esteem and developing social skills, as well as improving symptoms, decreasing the number of hospital admissions and eliminates stigmatization [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%