here are few diseases to which the human body is liable, more painful, and distressing to bear which, at the same time, I regret to add, is more common, yet less generally understood. " So wrote Frederick Salmon in his treatise on rectal prolapse. 1 How extraordinary that, almost 200 years later, these words continue to resonate. How is it that one of the more common "benign" and ostensibly treatable proctological conditions remains so poorly understood and, if recurrence is the metric of success, so badly treated? More than 100 surgical procedures have been described for the treatment of rectal prolapse, most of which are variations or a combination of amputation, resuspension, or plication. 2 With so many surgical options and recurrence rates up to 30%, 3-5 current understanding of the underlying pathogenesis, surgical anatomy, and corrective techniques must be questioned. 6 Simply put, there must be a better way.The causes of rectal prolapse are many, and presentations from infancy to old age are varied. Some would argue that rectal prolapse is a symptom of underlying failure of the pelvic floor to support and contain the pelvic organs rather than an a priori diagnosis. 2 Vaginal childbirth, excessive straining, obesity, pelvic denervation, loss of estrogen trophism at menopause, and primary connective tissue disorders are considered common pathways toward pelvic floor failure. 7 Aberrant tissue regeneration Funding/Support: None reported.