2020
DOI: 10.1002/fut.22098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does corporate hedging affect firm valuation? Evidence from the IPO market

Abstract: Focusing on the IPO market, we examine the influence of corporate hedging on firm valuation. Consistent with the argument that hedging reduces information asymmetry, we find that hedging IPO firms are associated with lower price revisions and underwriting fees. More important, hedging reduces IPO underpricing, especially for informationally opaque firms. This provides strong evidence that corporate hedging increases firm valuation. We also show that corporate hedging lowers aftermarket idiosyncratic volatility… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result does not appear to support the H2a hypothesis. One possible explanation for this result is a lack of industry-specific knowledge and expertise compared to insiders and others close to the company who have such knowledge that would aid effective oversight of the financial reporting process, or if the information environment is ambiguous, preventing audit committee independence from performing their monitoring and advising duties effectively (Armstrong et al , 2014; Bronson et al , 2009; Juhmani, 2017; Qiao et al , 2020). Table 6 also shows that the revised MCCG has a significant positive moderation impact on the association between ACSIZ and ILQ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result does not appear to support the H2a hypothesis. One possible explanation for this result is a lack of industry-specific knowledge and expertise compared to insiders and others close to the company who have such knowledge that would aid effective oversight of the financial reporting process, or if the information environment is ambiguous, preventing audit committee independence from performing their monitoring and advising duties effectively (Armstrong et al , 2014; Bronson et al , 2009; Juhmani, 2017; Qiao et al , 2020). Table 6 also shows that the revised MCCG has a significant positive moderation impact on the association between ACSIZ and ILQ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%