2018
DOI: 10.1177/0312896218797163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does corporate social responsibility reduce information asymmetry? Empirical evidence from Australia

Abstract: This study examines whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) reduces information asymmetry (IA). Using a firm-level CSR dataset of Australian publicly listed firms from 2004 to 2014, we estimate IA models using a fixed-effects panel estimator. We find that CSR performance is negatively associated with IA. Moreover, this negative relationship is stronger for larger firms and firms with stronger market power. We also find that the negative association between CSR and IA decreases for firms with a high level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0
31

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(147 reference statements)
6
47
0
31
Order By: Relevance
“…Information asymmetry changes human behavior toward the adoption of technology, making financial payments, selection of products and services and many more. A similar trend is also discussed by Rhodes (2010) and Nguyen et al (2019) which supports the argument that quality of information would lead to a proper and systematic investment of CSR funds. It is also hypothesized that lack of clarity of information causes a delay in decisions, causes inappropriate usage of funds and moreover leads to decay in the efficiency of the desired outcome.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Information asymmetry changes human behavior toward the adoption of technology, making financial payments, selection of products and services and many more. A similar trend is also discussed by Rhodes (2010) and Nguyen et al (2019) which supports the argument that quality of information would lead to a proper and systematic investment of CSR funds. It is also hypothesized that lack of clarity of information causes a delay in decisions, causes inappropriate usage of funds and moreover leads to decay in the efficiency of the desired outcome.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Using a sample of Korean firms, Choi et al (2010) document a positive relationship between CSR and corporate financial performance. Nguyen et al (2018), studying the effect of CSR on information asymmetry using a sample of Australian firms and find that CSR mitigates information asymmetry significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies examine a range of CFP measures (operational, accounting and market) for their association with the ESGP measure of interest (e.g., all the meta‐analytical studies reviewed in this article include multiple CFP measures). From a disclosure perspective, the literature shows evidence of ESGP as reducing informational asymmetry between the firm and key stakeholders (Fombrun and Shanley, 1990; Aghion and Holden, 2011; Nguyen et al , 2018), as well as being directed to a more specific outcome, for example ESG disclosure and dividend payments (Cheung et al , 2018; Ni and Zhang, 2019). Although ESG disclosures may be a proxy for actual ESGP (Beck et al , 2018), pressure from stakeholder groups in and outside the firm shape financial decisions, with firm decision‐making taking into account how disclosure may favourably address stakeholder concerns (Coleman et al , 2010), raising risks of green‐ or white‐washing.…”
Section: Alternative Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%