Does CSR affect the cost of equity capital: Empirical evidence from the targeted poverty alleviation of listed companies in China

Abstract

Social responsibility fulfillment helps modern enterprises achieve sustainable development. Based on empirical data on China's A-share listed companies in 2013-2016, this paper examines the impact of corporate social responsibility performance on a company's financing costs from the perspective of targeted poverty alleviation. Specifically, we find that enterprises' engagement in poverty alleviation social responsibility helps to reduce the cost of equity capital. The result is robust to using alternative indicators of the cost of equity capital, propensity score matching method, change model and sample removed financial sector. Furthermore, we find that the negative relationship between enterprises' engagement in poverty relief and the cost of equity capital is mainly concentrated in private enterprises and in the central and eastern regions of China. Moreover, the negative relationship mainly exists after China's listed companies were forced to disclose information on poverty alleviation. This paper also finds that institutional investors' shareholding plays a partial mediating role in this reduction effect and that enterprises' poverty alleviation efforts help companies improve their financial performance and firm value. This study enriches the relevant literature on corporate social responsibility and the cost of equity capital and has reference value for corporate sustainable development. It also provides a theoretical basis for corporate poverty alleviation work in developing countries and the economic results of CSR. OPEN ACCESS Citation: Yi Y, Xie B, Zhou L, Wei Y (2020) Does CSR affect the cost of equity capital: Empirical evidence from the targeted poverty alleviation of listed companies in China. PLoS ONE 15(2): e0227952. https://doi.org/10.

Corporate ethical behavior and the cost of equity capital: evidence from the world’s most ethical companies

“…In fact, the cost of capital is a more direct yardstick of corporate investment and financing decisions than is firm valuation. In addition, the cost of capital summarizes an investor's risk-return trade-off in his resource allocation decision (P astor et al, 2008;Yi et al, 2020).…”

“…So, looking for a lower cost of capital allows the firm to maximize the wealth of shareholders and sustain their investments. Similarly, recent years have seen the rise of a new strategic issue, namely, ranking a business in ethics and corporate social responsibility (CSR), that allows the firm to have future economic benefits and increase its growth opportunities while controlling a certain level of risk (Breuer et al, 2018;Yi et al, 2020). Thus, the quest for a lower capital cost stands as a major objective whereby the firm could maximize its shareholders' wealth while sustaining its investments.…”

The mediating effect of stock price crash risk on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and cost of equity moderated by state ownership: Moderated‐mediation analysis

“…The impact of CSR disclosure on the cost of equity capital is more intricate than just positive or negative (Chen & Zhang, 2021; Ishaq & Hussain, 2018; Yi et al, 2020). Given the ambiguity around the influence of CSR disclosure on equity capital costs, a more comprehensive approach to explaining the likely transmission mechanism between them is essential.…”

The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Executive Compensation on Implicit Cost of Equity: Evidence from French ESG Data

“…According to previous studies on the cost of equity [8][9][10][11] CSR is negatively related to the cost of equity. Besides, when the level of executive compensation depends on the degree to which SD objectives have been achieved, this negative correlation is significantly reinforced, indicating a potential substitution relationship between the executive compensation based on SD and the cost of equity.…”