2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does developmental prosopagnosia impair identification of other-ethnicity faces?

Abstract: Caucasian DPs and controls judged whether pairs of faces were identical or not • As expected, the DPs exhibited poor discrimination of same-ethnicity faces • Relative to controls, the DPs also exhibited impairment when judging Black faces • We found no evidence of disproportionate impairment for same-ethnicity faces • Both groups described similar levels of experience with other-ethnicity faces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results, as well as results of our item difficulty analyses showing high correspondence between easier and difficult items in DPs and controls, suggest that DPs' face-space has a similar layout to that of controls, but DPs face-space may be more densely clustered or have fewer dimensions (Cenac, Biotti, Gray, & Cook, 2019). Thus, the recollection signal typically cued by perceptual distinctiveness may be slightly weaker in DPs due to the potentially dense clustering of the face representations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These results, as well as results of our item difficulty analyses showing high correspondence between easier and difficult items in DPs and controls, suggest that DPs' face-space has a similar layout to that of controls, but DPs face-space may be more densely clustered or have fewer dimensions (Cenac, Biotti, Gray, & Cook, 2019). Thus, the recollection signal typically cued by perceptual distinctiveness may be slightly weaker in DPs due to the potentially dense clustering of the face representations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Whole-face sequences presented a single static face in its entirety for 480ms (Figure 1c). Faces were presented briefly in this condition to prevent observers employing a protracted serial analysis of the local features; for example observers who are thought be reliant on trivial local cues (e.g., developmental prosopagnosics) find this kind of presentation duration particularly challenging (Biotti & Cook, 2016;Cenac, Biotti, Gray, & Cook, 2019). Aperture sequences depicted a viewing window moving over the facial image with a vertical directionality (Figure 1d), either starting at the top and moving downwards, or starting at the bottom and moving upwards.…”
Section: Figure-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observers who are reliant on this kind of analysis (e.g. cases of developmental or acquired prosopagnosia) therefore find brief presentation durations extremely challenging (Biotti & Cook, 2016;Biotti et al, 2019;Cenac et al, 2019). The fact that typical observers exhibit good discrimination and categorisation of briefly presented (upright) faces has been widely attributed to rapid, efficient holistic processing (Farah et al, 1998;McKone & Yovel, 2009;Richler, Wong, et al, 2011;Rossion, 2008Rossion, , 2013.…”
Section: Target-face Ambiguity and Holistic Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…autism, schizophrenia), although co-occurring deficits in object processing are not uncommon 57 . The face processing impairments seen in DP appear to affect the perception of both same- and other-ethnicity faces 8 . Current estimates suggest that ~2% of the general population may experience lifelong face recognition difficulties severe enough to disrupt their daily lives 9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%