2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00159.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Diagnostic Coronary Angiography Induce Significant Coronary Microembolization in Stable, Ischemic Patients? A Prospective Study

Abstract: Detectable embolization with subsequent subclinical myonecrosis is an unlikely event.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact pathophysiologic mechanisms ultimately resulting in periprocedural acute cardiomyocyte are unknown, but may include direct trauma during contact of catheters and wires with cardiomyocytes in the left ventricle; microembolization of air, debris, and plaque from the aortic wall, aortic valve, or ostium of the left and right coronary arteries [21][22][23][24][25] ; transient myocardial ischemia due to the replacement of blood with the contrast agent in the coronary arteries 25 ; or a combination of ischemic and toxic injury inducing the high viscosity and osmolarity of the contrast agents. Mechanisms may be similar to those of contrastinduced nephropathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact pathophysiologic mechanisms ultimately resulting in periprocedural acute cardiomyocyte are unknown, but may include direct trauma during contact of catheters and wires with cardiomyocytes in the left ventricle; microembolization of air, debris, and plaque from the aortic wall, aortic valve, or ostium of the left and right coronary arteries [21][22][23][24][25] ; transient myocardial ischemia due to the replacement of blood with the contrast agent in the coronary arteries 25 ; or a combination of ischemic and toxic injury inducing the high viscosity and osmolarity of the contrast agents. Mechanisms may be similar to those of contrastinduced nephropathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Categorical data are expressed as frequencies and percentages, and were compared using the χ2 or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Continuous variables with normal distribution are expressed as mean±SD and were compared using the Student’s t-test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%