Does Discussion With Disagreement Discourage All Types of Political Participation? Survey Evidence From Hong Kong

Abstract

Past studies have found contradicting evidence regarding the influence of political discussion with disagreeing others on political participation. This study argues that the impact of discussion with disagreement is likely to depend on the type of parti cipatory activities involved. It conceptualizes a distinction between position-taking and nonposition-taking activities. The former refers to activities designed to have potential participants taking up a set position on a specific matter, whereas the latter refers to activities not designed as such. It is argued that discussion with disagreeing others is likely to suppress participation in position-taking activities, since such activities leave lesser room for participants to express the complexities of and possible ambivalence in their views. In contrast, discussion with disagreeing others may encourage parti cipation in nonposition-taking activities. Relevant hypotheses are tested with a survey conducted in Hong Kong examining the impact of discussion and disagreement on voting, protest participation, and calling into talk radio.

Socially Networked Heterogeneity: The Influence of WhatsApp as a Social Networking Site on Polarisation in Kenya

“…The frequency of such discussions affects the criticality and usefulness of information encountered within individual networks (Garrett, Carnahan, and Lynch 2013). People tend to comprehend new information more easily and carefully as they anticipate discussion with those of opposing viewpoints (Lee 2012). Therefore, the relationship between social network heterogeneity and the polarisation of…”

Does Disagreement Mitigate Polarization? How Selective Exposure and Disagreement Affect Political Polarization

“…Given the importance of exposure to conflicting political viewpoints, disagreement in political discussion has been widely assessed to demonstrate its influence on democratic outcomes such as political knowledge, opinion quality, political tolerance, and political engagement (Feldman & Price, 2008; F. L. F. Lee, 2012;Mutz, 2002b;Price et al, 2002). However, the current literature in this area lacks empirical evidence of the moderating role of disagreement, especially in the context of selective exposure and political polarization, and this subject has not been explicitly examined.…”

The Influence of Group Communication, Government–Citizen Interaction, and Perceived Importance of New Media on Online Political Discussion

“…Although this study focuses on political discussion via the Internet, “it does not mean that activities such as voting and protests should be abolished. Democracies in the real world are never going to fit perfectly with any ideal theoretical vision, be it deliberative, representative, agonistic, or other” (Lee, , p. 558). Further research should include more effective and sophisticated measurements to analyze political discussion and other forms of political activities and communication practices in the new media age.…”