2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(03)00045-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does education at all levels cause growth? India, a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
76
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
76
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the results of studies conducted by Benhabib and Spiegel (1994), Jones (1996), Engelbrecht (1997), Herbertsson (2003), Self and Grabowski (2004), Park (2006), Abu-Qarn and Abu-Bader (2007), Permani (2008), and others (Benhabib andSpiegel, 1994, Telatar andTerzi (2010), Keskin (2011), Hoşgorur andGezgin (2005), Caliskan et al (2013), Ozsahin and Karacor (2013), Yalcinkaya and Kaya (2016), Govdeli (2016) show that various educational indicators used as human capital positively affect economic growth.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the results of studies conducted by Benhabib and Spiegel (1994), Jones (1996), Engelbrecht (1997), Herbertsson (2003), Self and Grabowski (2004), Park (2006), Abu-Qarn and Abu-Bader (2007), Permani (2008), and others (Benhabib andSpiegel, 1994, Telatar andTerzi (2010), Keskin (2011), Hoşgorur andGezgin (2005), Caliskan et al (2013), Ozsahin and Karacor (2013), Yalcinkaya and Kaya (2016), Govdeli (2016) show that various educational indicators used as human capital positively affect economic growth.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Aghion and Howitt (2009), human capital and technological progress are two key inputs in all endogenous growth models. Self and Grabowski (2004) conclude in China that primary education had a strong and robust impact and a limited evidence of secondary education on economic growth. Chi (2008) concludes that tertiary education has a positive and larger impact on GDP growth than primary and secondary education.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Petrakis and Stamatakis (2002) found that in developing countries primary and secondary education has become primary factor that promotes growth, whereas in developed countries economic growth heavily lies on higher education. For the case of India, for example, Self and Grabowski (2004) found that the primary education has a strong causal relationship with economic growth, but it is not the case with secondary education. Meanwhile, Papageorgiou (2003) estimated that basic education only focuses on output production while secondary and higher education contribute to technological innovation.…”
Section: Icsbp Conference Proceedingsmentioning
confidence: 99%