2020
DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000003528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Educational Handover Influence Subsequent Assessment?

Abstract: COMMENTS (Including Strengths, Weaknesses and Suggestions for development.Description of performance during the rotation Rudolph spent eight weeks in this rotation during which time he was observed performing three histories and four physical examinations as well as placing a central line. His performance was discussed with all senior residents and attending staff who worked with him during the rotation. He performed overall as expected of an R2 at the beginning of the year. He was reliable and hard-working, h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants agreed to commit approximately 30 min to the study as a whole, which may have led us to recruit supervisors who were less busy or who had an interest in medical education. Compared with a shorter study at the same institution, but in different clinical disciplines [34], we found that our participants were more likely to have growth mindsets (99% versus 88% for clinical reasoning, 71% versus 35% for empathy-data reported elsewhere [17]) than participants in the shorter study, suggesting a potential selection bias. Our sample was nonetheless diverse in terms of its demographic characteristics and its positions on learner handover.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Participants agreed to commit approximately 30 min to the study as a whole, which may have led us to recruit supervisors who were less busy or who had an interest in medical education. Compared with a shorter study at the same institution, but in different clinical disciplines [34], we found that our participants were more likely to have growth mindsets (99% versus 88% for clinical reasoning, 71% versus 35% for empathy-data reported elsewhere [17]) than participants in the shorter study, suggesting a potential selection bias. Our sample was nonetheless diverse in terms of its demographic characteristics and its positions on learner handover.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…While understanding supervisor perspectives is critical to successful implementation, discussions regarding learner handover would benefit from robust evidence regarding the observed benefits and harms of learner handover as well as factors influencing their likelihood and extent. The majority of available experimental studies can be found within the educational, social, and organizational psychology literature [ 5 , 35 38 ], with a small, but growing, literature in health professions education with mixed results [ 17 , 39 ]. Further studies are needed to understand the potential positive and negative impacts of learner handover in medical education settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the potential benefits to learners, patients, and even faculty (Humphrey-Murto et al, 2020) from LHs might serve to counterbalance these fears (Fuchs et al, 2020;Pangaro, 2008). In fact, a recent randomized controlled study of clinical supervisors demonstrated that the sharing of information between supervisors improved targeted feedback without influencing scores (Dory et al, 2020). Additionally, differences in the vocabulary and expectations of supervisors may be a large contributor to these concerns (Pangaro, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%