2017
DOI: 10.1108/bfj-06-2016-0283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does electrolyzed water have different sanitizing effects than sodium hypochlorite on different vegetable types?

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the efficacy of microbial elimination using different sanitizers in raw vegetables (cherry tomatoes, spring onions, Chinese chives, and chicory) and to analyze the efficacy of Escherichia coli O157:H7 reduction by type of sanitizer and vegetable. Design/methodology/approach To assess the sanitizing effects of microbial elimination by variety of vegetable, the samples were grouped into four different washing methods: control (no sanitizer), 100 ppm chlorine, 100… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, chlorinated compounds generally have limited antimicrobial action, and under typical conditions, their reduction values reach approximately 2 log CFU/g. Chlorinated compounds are widely used by the food industry, mainly because they are inexpensive, but there are concerns related to the interaction with the organic components of food and the formation of toxic and potentially carcinogenic trihalomethanes, which have the potential to cause skin irritation [ 9 , 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, chlorinated compounds generally have limited antimicrobial action, and under typical conditions, their reduction values reach approximately 2 log CFU/g. Chlorinated compounds are widely used by the food industry, mainly because they are inexpensive, but there are concerns related to the interaction with the organic components of food and the formation of toxic and potentially carcinogenic trihalomethanes, which have the potential to cause skin irritation [ 9 , 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCl, HOCl, Cl 2 , OCl − , and O 2 are formed in the anode, while the cathode produces hydroxyl ions, which can react with Na ions generating NaOH. EOW contains free chlorine as the main microbial inactivation agent showing higher microbicidal effect against pathogens and spoilage microorganisms than NaOCl [16,54,55]. EOW is considered as an eco-friendly technology that presents the following advantages over other sanitizing methods: easy-to-find and cheap materials (NaCl and water), simple and on-site production, and low operational expenses and trihalomethanes formation.…”
Section: Electrolyzed Oxidizing Watermentioning
confidence: 99%