2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07818-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does emission trading scheme have spillover effect on industrial structure upgrading? Evidence from the EU based on a PSM-DID approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study employs the difference-in-differences (DID) method to explore the impact of CN-ETS participation on the quality of carbon emission disclosures. The DID is the most appropriate method for evaluating the impact of CN-ETS implementation on the quality of carbon emission disclosures as suggested by the prior literature [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Data Sample and Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study employs the difference-in-differences (DID) method to explore the impact of CN-ETS participation on the quality of carbon emission disclosures. The DID is the most appropriate method for evaluating the impact of CN-ETS implementation on the quality of carbon emission disclosures as suggested by the prior literature [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Data Sample and Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in this table, all absolute values of normalized bias value are less than 10 after matching. Meanwhile, the t-statistics after matching were not significant, implying there is no systematic difference between the experimental group and the control group, and that our matching estimation results are suitable and reliable [ 76 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a concern with the DID approach is that the estimation results can be biased if the treatment group and control group are not stochastically selected. Accordingly, scholars suggest using the propensity score matching (PSM, hereafter) method, which has been widely used in studies on policy effects since its introduction, to handle the endogenous problems caused by selection bias [ 75 , 76 , 77 ]. The main steps of this method involve: (1) Estimating a logit or other discrete choice model of program participation; (2) Defining the region of common support and balancing tests; (3) Matching pairs; and (4) Calculating the average treatment impact.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is may lead to bias. We employed the method which integrates propensity score matching with difference-in-differences method (PSM-DID) to test the robustness of the results obtained by the difference-in-differences method [78,79]. e main idea of propensity score matching (PSM) is to find city j in the control group and make it as similar as possible to city i in the experimental group, that is, x i � x j .…”
Section: Robustness Test Based On Psm-didmentioning
confidence: 99%