2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2020.101189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does emphasizing management bias decrease auditors’ sensitivity to measurement imprecision?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further note that while management bias is emphasised in application material relating to an assessment of management's method, assumptions and data, estimation uncertainty is discussed as an overarching consideration in paragraphs A390-A392. We note research (Van Landuyt, 2021) highlighting that emphasis on management bias can have the unintended consequence of reducing sensitivity to measurement imprecision (i.e., estimation uncertainty). Given the significance of estimation uncertainty in sustainability assurance, we encourage the IAASB to reflect on whether there is sufficient balance in the coverage of estimation uncertainty and management bias in the application material supporting paragraphs 134L and 134R.…”
Section: Do You Agree With the Approach To The Requirements In Ed-500...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further note that while management bias is emphasised in application material relating to an assessment of management's method, assumptions and data, estimation uncertainty is discussed as an overarching consideration in paragraphs A390-A392. We note research (Van Landuyt, 2021) highlighting that emphasis on management bias can have the unintended consequence of reducing sensitivity to measurement imprecision (i.e., estimation uncertainty). Given the significance of estimation uncertainty in sustainability assurance, we encourage the IAASB to reflect on whether there is sufficient balance in the coverage of estimation uncertainty and management bias in the application material supporting paragraphs 134L and 134R.…”
Section: Do You Agree With the Approach To The Requirements In Ed-500...mentioning
confidence: 99%