Introduction: the standard surgical treatment for incompetent saphenous veins is surgical ligation and removal of the affected vein. The endovenous thermal ablation is one of the recent endovenous treatments to great saphenous reflux with grade IA of recommendation. Endovenous thermal ablation is a minimally invasive technique that causes endothelial damage and local inflammation obliterating the target vein. Some studies on the risk factors for the occurrence of thrombosis in varicose vein surgery have already been carried out, but data are still scarce on the actual role of serum markers of hypercoagulability. Objective: To investigate serum markers of inflammation, thrombosis and adhesion molecules in treating great saphenous vein insufficiency by conventional surgical techniques and radiofrequency thermal ablation. Materials and methods: We selected 35 patients with varicose veins in the lower limbs with the indication for surgical treatment of the great saphenous vein. The patients were divided into two groups, one group undergoing radiofrequency endovenous thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein and the other group undergoing conventional surgery. All patients underwent duplex ultrasonography within seven days, within one month. Blood samples were collected before the procedure, at seven days and 30 days after the procedure. Evaluation of the levels of inflammatory mediators such as ICAM, VCAM, von Willebrand factor, soluble Pselectin, endogenous thrombin potential was investigated in comparisons between the conventional approach and radiofrequency. Results: The mean age of participants was 50 ± 12 years, with 27 (77.1%) patients being female. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 28 ± 6 kg/m² with no statistical difference between the groups. The most frequent comorbidity was systemic arterial hypertension; 11 (31.4%) patients with homogeneous distribution, three patients (12.5%) had class II EHIT. In the assessment of systemic inflammatory activity, WBC and platelet count, there were no significant differences between the groups at any of the times. Again, there was no significant difference in the assessment of thrombin generation and endothelial adhesion molecules, either in the intragroup or in the intergroup assessment. Conclusion: in the postoperative period, there is no difference in activation in the generation of thrombin generation, endothelial injury or activation of adhesion molecules between radiofrequency thermal ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein.