2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000199118.61229.70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Fibular Plating Improve Alignment After Intramedullary Nailing of Distal Metaphyseal Tibia Fractures?

Abstract: In this study, the proportion of fractures that lost alignment was smaller among those receiving stabilization of the fibula in conjunction with IM nailing compared with those receiving IM nailing alone. Adjunctive fibular stabilization was associated significantly with the ability to maintain fracture reduction beyond 12 weeks. At the present time, the authors recommend fibular plating whenever IM nailing is contemplated in the unstable distal tibia-fibular fracture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
86
0
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
86
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the case for this technique has been strengthened by the introduction of locking screws to maintain fracture length, alignment and rotation, there are concerns about nail use in distal segment fractures because of several technical limitations that make fracture reduction and stable fixation difficult [2,[22][23][24]. The long-lever arm, the short segment left for distal locking and the relatively wide metaphysis that can not afford a snug endosteal fit with little nail-cortex contact prohibiting automatic fracture alignment and allowing considerable nail mobility, all can result in a higher rate of malalignment and increased stress on the locking screws with a greater risk of screw failure, nail migration or ankle penetration [2,23]. This is further complicated by intra-articular extension or ankle instability due to lateral malleolar fractures [22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the case for this technique has been strengthened by the introduction of locking screws to maintain fracture length, alignment and rotation, there are concerns about nail use in distal segment fractures because of several technical limitations that make fracture reduction and stable fixation difficult [2,[22][23][24]. The long-lever arm, the short segment left for distal locking and the relatively wide metaphysis that can not afford a snug endosteal fit with little nail-cortex contact prohibiting automatic fracture alignment and allowing considerable nail mobility, all can result in a higher rate of malalignment and increased stress on the locking screws with a greater risk of screw failure, nail migration or ankle penetration [2,23]. This is further complicated by intra-articular extension or ankle instability due to lateral malleolar fractures [22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-lever arm, the short segment left for distal locking and the relatively wide metaphysis that can not afford a snug endosteal fit with little nail-cortex contact prohibiting automatic fracture alignment and allowing considerable nail mobility, all can result in a higher rate of malalignment and increased stress on the locking screws with a greater risk of screw failure, nail migration or ankle penetration [2,23]. This is further complicated by intra-articular extension or ankle instability due to lateral malleolar fractures [22][23][24]. Such mechanical conditions are less favourable in unreamed nailing where the discrepancy between the nail diameter and the distal medulla is even greater.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In cases where both the distal tibia and fibula are fractured, except the tibial fixation by an external fixation device or intramedullary osteosynthesis, a growing number of authors supports the osteosynthesis of the fibula with a plate which facilitates reconstruction of the lateral column providing additional support to the ankle joint. 25,26 The curvature of the bone to which a plate is being placed to, is a key factor determining the contact surface and the amount of stress the plate applies to the bone. 22 In this study, using a mathematical modeling process we evaluated the surface topography of the fibula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical studies came to miscellaneous results, 8,11,12,24,25 but there is a tendency that fixation of the fibula could be helpful when less rigid fixation of the tibia fracture is used. However, the fracture's nature and the soft tissue situation have to be considered, when an additional incision is performed to fix the fibula.…”
Section: Role Of the Fibula In Lower Leg Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no significant decrease in tibial defect site motion, when a plate or a distally and proximally locked intramedullary nail was used. In a retrospective study of 72 fractures, Egol et al 8 found that fibular plating improves alignment after statically locked intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibia fractures. Morrison et al 9 showed that fibular plate fixation increased both torsional and longitudinal stability of middiaphyseal tibial fractures treated with external fixation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%