2017
DOI: 10.1057/sj.2016.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Finland need an entry-ban system for football matches (and similar public events)? Examining the current state of regulation and security issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature identified in this review covers a number of factors related to the specific context of a match which may impact upon violent and antisocial behaviour. First, Paasonen and Aaltonen (2017) use rich data from Finland between the years 1997 and 2014 to analyse the effect that different situational factors have on deviant behaviour. In a simple statistical analysis, they find the following: differences in the months of the year when matches took place were not statistically significant, but days of the week (Saturday had more disturbances), the venue of the match and the kick-off time (before 6 p.m.)…”
Section: What Impact May Situational and Atmosphere-related Factors Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature identified in this review covers a number of factors related to the specific context of a match which may impact upon violent and antisocial behaviour. First, Paasonen and Aaltonen (2017) use rich data from Finland between the years 1997 and 2014 to analyse the effect that different situational factors have on deviant behaviour. In a simple statistical analysis, they find the following: differences in the months of the year when matches took place were not statistically significant, but days of the week (Saturday had more disturbances), the venue of the match and the kick-off time (before 6 p.m.)…”
Section: What Impact May Situational and Atmosphere-related Factors Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The punishment of fan misbehaviour by the sports jurisdiction, however, has not been investigated that much. Whereas, Hilpert (2009), Noli (2016), Shvets (2016), Tsoukala (2013) and Vasilyev et al (2018) analyse the legal legitimacy of the penalties, there is only little research focussing (to some extent) on their effects (Paasonen and Aaltonen, 2017;Shvets, 2016). So far, no one has analysed the extent to which the objectives of the penalties were achieved, as well as their ability to create incentive compatibility and has placed the penalties in the complex relationships of the football universe.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on fan behaviour is also very extensive but mostly sociologically driven (Dunning et al, 1986;Marsh, 1978;Stott and Reicher, 1998). So far, only very few papers have looked at the penalties for fan misbehaviour (Noli, 2016;Paasonen and Aaltonen, 2017;Shvets, 2016) and none has explored them in an agency-theoretical framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arī vienas un tās pašas komandas dažādai atribūtikai ir atšķirīga nozīme. Šeit var izšķirt trīs galvenās grupas: 149 1. "Kauju organizēšanas" atribūtika.…”
Section: Līdzjutēji Bez Kriminogēnajām Izpausmēmunclassified