32e Conférence Francophone Sur l'Interaction Homme-Machine 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3450522.3451246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does folding improve the usability of interactive surfaces in future airliner cockpits An evaluation under turbulent conditions and varying cognitive load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that the folds helped to reduce physical effort by stabilizing the arm and hand. This physicality was also associated with better performance in the piloting task in a turbulent environment [17].…”
Section: Touch the First Dimension Relates Tomentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results showed that the folds helped to reduce physical effort by stabilizing the arm and hand. This physicality was also associated with better performance in the piloting task in a turbulent environment [17].…”
Section: Touch the First Dimension Relates Tomentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For example, a study by Rouwhorst et al [70] introduced a touchscreen control panel for mode selection, but the system did not reduce workload or enhance situation awareness in a statistically significant manner and this worsening effect was aggravated under severe turbulence. In fact, touchscreens are being introduced relatively slowly into the cockpits of commercial aircraft, mainly because of the safety issues associated with use in adverse turbulent conditions [17] that impact the accurate interaction with touch-based interfaces, potentially leading to unintended inputs or errors [17,19,27].…”
Section: Touch the First Dimension Relates Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second part of the study aimed at identifying vibrotactile pattern characteristics that may be resilient to turbulence (Q2). First, it is worth mentioning that the simulated turbulence based on the ISO 2631-1 standard and previous studies [8,11,25] was representative of real turbulence. This was confirmed by most of our participants including licensed pilots.…”
Section: Vibrotactile Pattern Design For Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%