2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does foliar nutrient resorption regulate the coupled relationship between nitrogen and phosphorus in plant leaves in response to nitrogen deposition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our result revealed a less stoichiometric response magnitude of leaf litter to P and N + P addition than leaf itself (Figures and ), which was contrary to our expectation that high nutrient‐induced decrease in leaf resorption should increase litter stoichiometric response in comparison with leaf itself (Brant & Chen, ; You et al, ). It is likely because we sampled leaf from tree saplings due to the difficulty in getting leaf sample from adult trees (height > 30 m), but leaf litter is mostly from adult trees.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, our result revealed a less stoichiometric response magnitude of leaf litter to P and N + P addition than leaf itself (Figures and ), which was contrary to our expectation that high nutrient‐induced decrease in leaf resorption should increase litter stoichiometric response in comparison with leaf itself (Brant & Chen, ; You et al, ). It is likely because we sampled leaf from tree saplings due to the difficulty in getting leaf sample from adult trees (height > 30 m), but leaf litter is mostly from adult trees.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This resource allocation strategy is necessary to maintain or increase tree photosynthesis under severe light competition, which leads to a greater leaf nutrient demand (Hautier et al, 2009) and stoichiometric response (Güsewell, 2004;María et al, 2005). Furthermore, our result revealed a less stoichiometric response magnitude of leaf litter to P and N + P addition than leaf itself (Figures 1 and 2), which was contrary to our expectation that high nutrientinduced decrease in leaf resorption should increase litter stoichiometric response in comparison with leaf itself (Brant & Chen, 2015;You et al, 2018). It is likely because we sampled leaf from tree saplings due to the difficulty in getting leaf sample from adult trees (height > 30 m), but leaf litter is mostly from adult trees.…”
Section: Different Responses Of N:p Ratio Among Multiple Ecosystem Cocontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…N addition × P addition on plant N pools was indeed synergistic at both species and community levels, albeit antagonistic for plant N concentrations at community level (Figure ). N addition increases the demand for P by stimulating plant growth; thus, extra P addition could counterbalance this N‐induced P limitation, allowing the full N fertilization effect to be expressed (You et al, ). In this case, the N addition effect could be larger in the combined treatment with P than in the N‐only treatment, resulting in a synergistic N addition × P addition effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The averages of NRE and PRE in the two plantations were 39.91% and 34.61%, respectively (Fig. 4 a,b), which were lower than those in global terrestrial forests (47.4% to 62.1% and 53.6% to 64.9%, respectively) (Vergutz et al 2012;You et al 2018). The unexpectedly low NuRE may be explained by the high variation nutrient use strategies in subtropical forests.…”
Section: Leaf N and P Concentrations And Nutrient Restrictionmentioning
confidence: 87%