2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does foreign aid mitigate the adverse effect of expropriation risk on foreign direct investment?

Abstract: JEL classifications:We construct a model of FDI, risk and aid, where a country loses access to FDI and aid if the country expropriates FDI. We show that: (i) the threat of expropriation leads to under-investment; (ii) the optimal level of FDI decreases as the risk of expropriation rises; and (iii) aid mitigates the adverse effect of expropriation risk on FDI. The empirical analysis employs data for 35 low-income countries and 28 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, over the period 1983-2004. We find that risk has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Cooray et al (2014), Asiedu et al (2009) among others we calculate the means for reach index for each country and then marginal impacts are estimated at the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th and 95th percentiles of the mean as well as the mean reach index calculated based on sample means. The country names reported in the table correspond to the particular percentile of reach index.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Cooray et al (2014), Asiedu et al (2009) among others we calculate the means for reach index for each country and then marginal impacts are estimated at the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th and 95th percentiles of the mean as well as the mean reach index calculated based on sample means. The country names reported in the table correspond to the particular percentile of reach index.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first principal component, PC 1 explains the largest possible variation in the dataset subject to the constraint, We address our endogeneity concerns by employing Dynamic Panel Estimators. Dynamic Panel Estimators allow us to address the endogeneity issues by not having to find strictly exogenous instruments and, thus, have become popular for recent empirical panel studies [see, for instance, Dutta et al (2013), Asiedu and Lien (2011), Asiedu et al (2009), Djankov et al (2006, Acemoglu et al (2008) to mention a few]. A linear dynamic panel-data (DPD) is estimated to capture the effect of lagged corruption on current corruption.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 See Graham et al (2014) and Li (2009). constraint, pressuring borrower countries to refrain from expropriation. Complementing work by Asiedu et al (2009) who contend that foreign aid can act as a carrot to encourage country compliance with foreign investment contracts and reduce expropriation risk, we claim that the Fund's capacity to impose the stick of costly sanctions on borrowers constrains host countries that otherwise have few limits on their policy actions. This places the Fund in a stronger position to inhibit direct violations of international property rights.…”
Section: The Determinants Of Expropriationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…At host country level, in addition to the country level variables mentioned earlier, we first included political risk at the year of the subsidiary's establishment based on the Government Stability dimension in the ICRG database (Asiedu, Jin, & Nandwa, 2009;Buckley et al, 2007). Government stability assesses the government's ability to carry out its declared programs as well as its ability to stay in office.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%