2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03397-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Group discussion exaggerate or diminish males’ reactions to a sexual assault scene?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, Shteynberg et al (2014) found that dominant affective experiences were intensified by the collaborative evaluation of affective stimuli. This finding is consistent with research having group members interact on a task such that they jointly pay attention to the task (e.g., Bramesfeld & Gasper, 2008; Hinsz et al, 2022; Park & Hinsz, 2015).…”
Section: Moods and Information Processing In Groupssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, Shteynberg et al (2014) found that dominant affective experiences were intensified by the collaborative evaluation of affective stimuli. This finding is consistent with research having group members interact on a task such that they jointly pay attention to the task (e.g., Bramesfeld & Gasper, 2008; Hinsz et al, 2022; Park & Hinsz, 2015).…”
Section: Moods and Information Processing In Groupssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moods have long been related to retrieval processes in that mood dependent memory suggested that retrieval is more likely if the mood experienced during encoding is also the mood experienced during retrieval (e.g., Eich, 1995). However, these effects are not likely to be similar in group situations because moods and stored information may be unshared among group members during encoding and retrieval (Hinsz et al, 2022). However, if an established transactive memory system is available, then enhanced memory can result when positive moods (e.g., “Honey, where are the cookies?”) or negative moods (e.g., “What were the exact details of the mugging?”) match the valence of the information being retrieved.…”
Section: Moods and Information Processing In Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%