2015
DOI: 10.3390/educsci5040380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Higher Education Level the Playing Field? Socio-Economic Differences in Graduate Earnings

Abstract: Education-and in particular higher education-is often regarded as a route to social mobility. For this to be the case, however, the link between family background and adult outcomes must be broken (or at least reduced) once we take account of an individual's education history. This paper provides new evidence on differences in graduates' earnings by socioeconomic background, exploiting rich individual-level data to account for more of the ways in which graduates from different socioeconomic backgrounds differ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model of universities as bastions of an elite liberal education is being replaced across the globe by one in which universities are seen as accessible providers of applicable and relevant knowledge [ 8 – 10 ]. This transition, however, has sometimes had undesirable and unexpected consequences and, with more and more money being spent on HE internationally, the debate has intensified over whether it is actually worth it or not, and more specifically whether it actually delivers social mobility [ 11 14 ]. There is evidence, for example, suggest that the growth of HE in China may have actually intensified social inequalities, at least in some circumstances [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of universities as bastions of an elite liberal education is being replaced across the globe by one in which universities are seen as accessible providers of applicable and relevant knowledge [ 8 – 10 ]. This transition, however, has sometimes had undesirable and unexpected consequences and, with more and more money being spent on HE internationally, the debate has intensified over whether it is actually worth it or not, and more specifically whether it actually delivers social mobility [ 11 14 ]. There is evidence, for example, suggest that the growth of HE in China may have actually intensified social inequalities, at least in some circumstances [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dummy variable adjustment method is a common method for dealing with missing data and is beneficial for retaining sample size (Allison, 2002(Allison, , 2010Puma et al, 2009). Furthermore, this technique can be widely found in published education and higher education-focused research (Adamecz-Völgyi et al, 2020;Crawford & Erve, 2015;Fitzpatrick, 2019;Marcenaro-Gutierrez et al, 2016;Whitaker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, with school-type homogamy their husbands are more likely to be privately educated, and this yields an additional boost to their earnings. Studies variously reveal a large pay premium for private schooling in Britain, or a substantially greater chance of being in the top earnings decile, or of attending a high-status occupation, or of avoiding downward social mobility (Dolton & Vignoles, 2000;Naylor, Smith & McKnight, 2002;Dearden et al, 2002;Crawford & Vignoles, 2014;Macmillan, Tyler & Vignoles, 2015;Crawford & van der Erve, 2015;Green et al, 2012;Green et al, 2017a;Green et al, 2018). For women, much or all of this return is accounted for by their educational attainment, but for men there remains a direct pay premium, over and above that which can be explained by their educational credentials.…”
Section: School-type Homogamy and The Marriage Market Return To Private Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%