Does hospital ownership affect patient experience? An investigation into public–private sector differences in England

Abstract

Using patient experience survey data, the paper investigates whether hospital ownership affects the level of quality reported by patients whose care is funded by the National Health Service in areas other than clinical quality. We estimate a switching regression model that accounts for (i) some observable characteristics of the patient and the hospital episode; (ii) selection into private hospitals; and (iii) unmeasured hospital characteristics captured by hospital fixed effects.We find that the experience reported by patients in public and private hospitals is different, i.e., most dimensions of quality are delivered differently by the two types of hospitals, with each sector offering greater quality in certain specialties or to certain groups of patients. However, the sum of all ownership effects is not statistically different from zero at sample means. In other words, hospital ownership in and of itself does not affect the level of quality of the average patient's reported experience. Differences in mean reported quality levels between the private and public sectors are entirely attributable to patient characteristics, the selection of patients into public or private hospitals and unobserved characteristics specific to individual hospitals, rather than to hospital ownership.

Understanding patients’ trust toward community healthcare providers under different primary care settings in China: Impact of hospital ownership and registration mode

“…An empirical study in the USA revealed that private hospitals provide a better hospital environment with quieter and cleaner rooms, while nonprofit hospitals have lower mortality and readmission rates (Ding, ). Similar results were found by empirical studies in the UK (Pérotin, Zamora, Reeves, Bartlett, & Allen, ) and Taiwan (Lien, Chou, & Liu, ).…”

Do private hospitals outperform public hospitals regarding efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care in the European Union? A literature review

“…However, Pérotin did not find a significant difference on the reported overall patient experiences between public and private clinics. Differences that were found seemed to relate to other variables such as patient characteristics …”

“…Both Pérotin et al and Owusu‐Frimpong et al examine UK patient experiences. The latter study finds that users of ISTCs have higher satisfaction rates than the users of public facilities for amenities, for instance, obtaining attention from doctors .…”

“…60 This corresponds to the results of a multilevel analysis, also from Italy, which assessed that the risk of dying was significantly less in private hospitals. 61 Both Pérotin et al 62 and Owusu-Frimpong et al 63 examine UK patient experiences. The latter study finds that users of ISTCs have higher satisfaction rates than the users of public facilities for amenities, for instance, obtaining attention from doctors.…”

New Forms of Provider in the English National Health Service

“…taking account of the differences between the patient groups treated in ISTCs, as compared to NHS facilities) might have been insufficient. Recently, Perotin et al (2010) have used another data set to investigate the quality of care provided by ISTCS compared to NHS services. This data comes from the Patient Experience Survey, which is carried out annually among NHS and ISTC patients.…”